Tale of a recovering disaster-holic
Do you know the sensation ? Dread, dragging at the pit of your stomach. Tears of despair shot through with self loathing. The constant recrimination and re examination. How did I did I get myself in this mess. Over and over in your mind repeating each step that led you to it ? Yes ? So you've lost your Blackberry too?
OK - yes indeed, lets get it into perspective - no one got hurt and no one even lost any money. However being bereft of my little companion - even if only for the weekend has given me pause for thought. Given my compulsive emailing habit, existing incommunicado without the blackberry has turned me into sort of virtual Trappist monk for a couple of days, so reflection does seem an appropriate response. It throws up a familiar theme I suppose - and one that seems acute from my own place on the economic spectrum.
For the one person business, changes in technology and communications have brought at the same time this astonishing increase in capacity with an equal increase in vulnerability - it's as if you suddenly got five times bigger in height and weight but your feet remained exactly the same size. You spend your life marvelling at your new reach and power but at the same time aware that you are perpetually on the verge of toppling over. And the scale of that increase in power is astonishing. It is one of those daft ' Would you believe it ?' facts but still it's the case that even the average domestic lap top is about 2,000 times more powerful that all of the IT back up that the Apollo moon missions possessed. But what is maybe even more gasp inducing- if we ever bothered to reflect on it - was that it took me just two seconds to check that particular 'fact' out without leaving my chair. That instantaneous access - and our bland expectation of it - is truly mind-boggling
And if it fails ? The exhilarating blend of power and vulnerability highlights the vital issue that the long ago days of Apollo XIII showed up in stark relief - at the end of the day , if you can't avoid the threat of disaster -and rest assured, you won't - you need to have resources for disaster recovery. And that's the area where the tiny business is most exposed. An acquaintance of mine who spent a number of years working in Japan - in the days when Japan was the byword for endeavour and enterprise - always claimed that the real hidden strength of the Japanese economy then was the capacity to throw massive human resource at a problem. The one person band runs very quickly to the limit of resources and while a lost blackberry is still a huge irritation for corporate man it can quite a lot more threatening for me.
As it happens I did have one half of a disaster recovery plan in place - an insurance policy ( taken out almost against my better judgement to be honest - I mean who is gping to misplace their blackberry !) put a new one in my shaking hands within 24 hours - a few phone calls then had it buzzing with emails after a few hours more - but contacts and appointments will need a more painful reconstruction.
Anyway in the very best tradition of investing in a five lever lock the very minute the horse arrives in a neighbouring county, I have been doing a little investigation. And find to my mild exasperation that there is ( of course) an app available that will compel any lost smartphone to shriek its whereabouts if unwittingly abandoned and it will even find itself for you on a map just like the old 'X marks the spot' on the Treasure Island map.
All of which might sensibly prompt the real question to put to the phone - 'OK if you are so bloomin' smart, smart-phone, how come you let me lose you in the first place?'
Well, there has been some pretty intensive forensic analysis of all of this at stately Loftus Towers over the last couple of days. My wife- who generally treats my relationship with the blackberry with a weary contempt - took pity on me in my muddled bereavement. Her in-depth questioning has probably identified a further essential refinement to the current 'lost blackberry' app. That is the one that activates an engine immobiliser whenever a clown tries to leave his drive with the blackberry perched precariously on the roof of the car. Because that seems to the most plausible explanation of the latest crisis.
Recovery is a lot more of a challenge when it's you that is the disaster.
(PS So, if you were expecting to see me in the next week or so - and notwithstanding the stuff above, think its still worth your while - a email to remind me would be very welcome!)
Older/Newer
« Future generations will force change | Electric Vehicles - Oui »






















I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest
but your sites really nice, keep it up! I'll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back down the road. Many thanks
If the Health and Social Care Bill sets out some of the parameters for competition but much of this is of necessity very broad and open to interpretation – ( see Angela’s current blog at the Nuffield trust site- off this page) and If this job of interpretation of so-called parameters for competition falls largely to the new economic regulator â Monitor, then who else most importantly gets to interpret things as they happen? Dare I remind everyone even at this late stage about the Patient led NHS brought in back in 2005. Patients and the public come first so let’s make sure there’s room for even one individual to raise concerns appropriately when it’s necessary to affect the direction of change. Surely the personalisation of health and social care thanks to the most modern of IT technology is possible, without compromising upon the wholeness of an individuals work/life balance – including one’s enjoyment of a fullfilling family life lived as one may choose in privacy, dignity and with autonomy.
Worst scenario yet…I get the fictionalization, totally even though it would never happen. But everything afterwards is horrible. It includes the conservatives, a Lib-Lab alliance, a super powerful racist formation of the BNP and Eng Dems, the greens, and independents. Basically when I like to play a scenario, it’s okay if its weird (meaning the background) but it’s just not professional. The Conservatives are SUPER POWERFUL, no way to win. In fact the goal of the Lib-Lab pact is to become the minority. The racist party is also way to powerful and leads me to believe either there is no thought put into this or the creator was biased.
Worst scenario yet…I get the fictionalization, totally even though it would never happen. But everything afterwards is horrible. It includes the conservatives, a Lib-Lab alliance, a super powerful racist formation of the BNP and Eng Dems, the greens, and independents. Basically when I like to play a scenario, it’s okay if its weird (meaning the background) but it’s just not professional. The Conservatives are SUPER POWERFUL, no way to win. In fact the goal of the Lib-Lab pact is to become the minority. The racist party is also way to powerful and leads me to believe either there is no thought put into this or the creator was biased.
Worst scenario yet…I get the fictionalization, totally even though it would never happen. But everything afterwards is horrible. It includes the conservatives, a Lib-Lab alliance, a super powerful racist formation of the BNP and Eng Dems, the greens, and independents. Basically when I like to play a scenario, it’s okay if its weird (meaning the background) but it’s just not professional. The Conservatives are SUPER POWERFUL, no way to win. In fact the goal of the Lib-Lab pact is to become the minority. The racist party is also way to powerful and leads me to believe either there is no thought put into this or the creator was biased.
Aah... Aangirfan is Scottish!Hoots maun!Back in the early 60's I used to know Sean Connery and other Scottish actors ...er... Stanley Black(?) an actor/comedian cum known 'agitator'? I liked him, he was great. He and Connery together and the sparks flew! It was the only time Sean could express himself in public without a script, Scottish politics and 'those Brit bastards'.I made myself popular by saying it wasn't Scottish oil, but British and American ...and Norwegian. The only thing Scottish about it was that it was convenient, and cheap, to draw the lines to nearby Scotland, and base the service-sector there. It got the politicians votes, too.The oil was discovered by King Olav of Norway during the war. He overheard 2 USA military men chugging whiskey and talking about 'being so close and yet so far, pity the Germans are in the way', and understood Norway came into it somewhere, inquiring as to what exactly they were talking about. The oil. In theory. The men were geologists before the war, and suspected the presence of oil in the North Sea area. So he offered free facilities to the men when the war was over to explore the viability of oil off his coast. They did this. Norway funded the search and found the oil. The USA were the only industrial-complex able to drill and pump-up the oil, so they had to be involved.Then all others in the area got into the act, trying to pass laws laying claim to areas of the North Sea in case there was oil there too. This included the Brits. Olav wasn't happy. Most of the oil is closer to Norway than GB. But he had to bargain, he needed to trade with GB, he wanted to maintain good relations, he and his people were forever indebted to the British people for their support in beating the Germans. He countered that GB had a huge industrial complex and a vaste worldwide trade to live off, they weren't dependent on the oil. Norway was totally bankrupt after the war, they only had the fishing to live-off and that didn't look good. He was quiet prepared to offer Britain VERY good terms for the Norwegian oil, but the greedy Brits steamrollered all over him and took the lions-share for themselves. The British side of the oil was paid for by London, on money loaned from the Yanks, the Scots were not involved. I know this as I knew Olav personally, my dad was a Captain (later, for a short while, a Major) in the 'Kongens Garde', the Lifeguards, and actually shared the same desk in Olav's office the last years of the war, as a personal assistant. As Olav's family were in Canada we became his surrogate family in GB. He wanted to be our godfather but protocol didn't allow it. But he used to visit us after we moved back to GB, and chat. He loved being just a normal person, often on his own without a bodyguard. We used to play footie down the rec with the current king, Harald, teaching him to swear in English!