Midland Metro is the ONLY option
This has been a bit of a roller-coaster week for the Midland Metro.
No sooner had it emerged that Centro and the city council were looking to get something moving on the Snow Hill-New Street section of the proposed city centre extension (bringing Metro more into line with the City Centre Plan, it emerged later in the week) than Birmingham Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Jerry Blackett was talking about the business community withdrawing support for Metro on the grounds that the Government is never going to fund it.
It's tempting to ask: "what support?". Certainly in Mr Blackett's case every comment I've seen him make on the Metro has been consistently negative. He's been "not sure" about trams on the Hagley Road, he's suggested that a fleet of "fast buses" would be much cheaper and almost as effective, and on Saturday once again he was suggesting that funding should be sought for "more buses" instead of trams.
How in the name of all that's sane can more buses be squeezed on to the streets of Birmingham? I doubt very much that "more buses" would have been good enough for Manchester's Chamber of Commerce.
True, we have a Labour Government which has been resolutely anti-light rail, in direct contradiction of John Prescott's pronounceents when it came to office in 1997. But it's wrong to assume that political realities are necessarily set in stone. It's not going to be long before this Government's mind will be concentrated on how it is going to get itself re-elected. And if Brown is replaced by Cameron who's to say he won't endorse tram schemes as a demonstration of his green credentials? After all, Mero Line 1 was built under a Tory government.
The bottom line is this: traffic in the West Midlands is seizing up, a step-change in public transport is desperately needed, and the Metro is the only option on the table (because "more buses" is not a step-change).
This is the time for Manchester-style unity and concerted lobbying, not giving up and doing the Government's dirty work for it.
Older/Newer
« Learning to live in China | What exactly does Global City Local Heart mean? »













The embarrassing difference between public transport in British regional cities and those in continental Europe and, yes, even car-loving North America, is demonstrated once again. Given the misery commuters endure travelling to and from work every day, I'm surprised people aren't more militant about it.
A city the size of Birmingham in any other comparable European country would actually have an Underground, let alone trams. Go and visit www.urbanrail.net and click on cities throughout the continent. Even Greece's second city, Thessaloniki, will soon be on that map - its Underground is currently under construction. In France, Germany, Spain and Italy cities of smaller size and lesser stature than Birmingham have Undergrounds. Astonishingly, even Palma in Mallorca has one. Whereas in Birmingham's case the idea is laughed out of Whitehall and as a result disregarded in Birmingham itself, quite justifiably, as a hopeless dream.
So we are left with trams. I'm amazed that even the ridiculously modest Metro extension from Snow Hill to Five Ways is still too much to swallow and that there is now talk of scaling it back to make it more achievable. At this rate just extending the tram from Snow Hill to Old Square will seem like a major victory. Ten years after Birmingham's one and only tramline opened, it has not been possible to extend it from one side of the city centre to the other. It's pathetic and embarrassing. This is the second largest city in the world's fifth largest economy and whatever it's had to endure to get its main train and coach stations redeveloped is as nothing compared to the ordeal of getting the public transport system it deserves.
Partly this is Birmingham's fault - not all key stakeholders have been singing from the same hymnsheet on the need for trams, unlike Manchester... which is just tiresomely good at trumping Birmingham at pretty much everything at the moment (please, people, make it stop).
But the main reason is the Treasury's bewildering and perpetual aversion to spending on public transport infrastructure (even in London it's a battle). Quite simply, a different philosophy prevails in this country. In most European countries, they think: yes, trams and Undergrounds are expensive - but that's the price you pay for living in civilised cities. Their worth isn't questioned, therefore their cost is accepted. They are 'no-brainers'. Whereas in this country, it's up to cities to make a 'business case' that demonstrates a tangible rate of return. That is not what public transport is about, and nor should it be. Especially as its hard to quantify the appeal that trams have over buses. Trams and Undergrounds are much more than just ways of transporting people about - they are key weapons in the armouries of cities' self-promotion. Cities that have them just feel somehow more appealing, more mature and more important than those that don't. A city that has trams rather than just buses is one that implicitly says: "I am worth this investment. And I'm worth yours."
I accept that Birmingham will never get an Underground but scaling back its Metro plans would be a big mistake. If anything, Birmingham should be lobbying even more ferociously for the government to cough up. If not this goverment, then the next one. This government probably feels its done its bit by agreeing to fund New Street. It's time to start making the case to senior Conservatives. Of late they seem fonder of Birmingham than Labour does, and they have a strong green message that funding tram expansion would tie nicely into.
But settling for the status quo is not an option.
Jean-Luc,
Many thanks for that brilliant response. I agree wholeheartedly with everything you say, and you're particularly eloquent on the issue of why, when it comes to big-city public transport, trams cut it and buses don't.
What does it say â not least to potential investors â about Birmingham's status relative to Manchester and Nottingham if those cities have achieved modern tram systems and Birmingham is happy to settle for more buses? It's no coincidence that a Metrolink tram figures in the opening credits of Coronation Street.
The lack of vision and ambition for the city from some of our politicians and business people makes me angry and embarrassed. It was Jerry Blackett, by the way, who declared that he couldn't see what was wrong with the last design for New Street. Fortunately everyone else could, which is why Network Rail ran an international competition to improve it.
My point about not assuming the Government's anti-light rail stance is set in stone seems to have received some support already following Liam Byrne's comments, reported in yesterday's Post, which suggest that the Government may be rethinking its policy of coupling transport investment to road-charging.
We're still a long way from the coffers being thrown open but at least there's some sign of movement, which is why it would be particularly inept to give up on the Metro now. We need a united front and a determination from the city's political and business establishment which has been sadly lacking up to now.
I agree completely with Jean-Luc Fournier.
This issue is now becoming desperate. I'd go as far as to say it's the single most important issue that faces Birmingham. Why is there so little urgency amongst city leaders? Can't they see the traffic mayhem through the tinted glass of chauffeur-driven Jags? It can't be long until the city grinds to a complete halt.
The political situation surrounding this, is also worsening daily. It seems that a further blow to the cause will be announced tomorrow when the seven West Midlands authorities abandon any interest in congestion charging (source: thestirrer.co.uk).
This is completely the wrong tack. We need to price the motorists out of the city centre, squeeze that ã300 million out of the government and start laying track in our streets as soon as possible. However unpalatable it may be to the current administration to jump through Ruth Kelly's hoops, it has to be done for the good of the city.
What everyone has said here sums up the situation with Metro Extension schemes very well. I feel Birmingham has been overlooked in terms of funding for many years and not just for the Metro extensions. There are many other Public Transport Improvements that could bring significant benefits to the region. One of these improvements that, as far as I am aware, is not going to be realistically progressed is the construction of tunnels under the city for the Cross City Line. This would provide a fantastic link through the city and relieve some of the congestion at New Street. Liverpool has its suberban trains running under its city and I believe the benefits in Birmingham would outweigh the cost. Also what ever happened to the reopening of the platforms at Moor Street? Surely that is a reasonably cheap solution to the congestiong through the Snow Hill Tunnel?
Of course there is talk of providing a new High Speed Rail Link through Birmingham by 2026. If this did happen then Metro and other rail extensions would be essential for people to get to and from a new High Speed Rail Station and these links need to be planned now.
I have also read recently that Birmingham is considering changing the alignment of the currently planned Metro Extensions. I was concerned that this would further delay an already late project by another 5 or 6 years because of the need to get a new Transport and Works Act order. However it may be sensible that the route goes via Eastside and the Bull Ring. These areas of the city generate or will generate a significant amount of need for travel. It may be right to put the Metro there but is it the best option to move the existing planned extension.
As for only extending to New Street station. I think that Birmingham should be gunning for the full extension. But let us not forget that just getting the Metro into the City Centre would be the Metro's best advertisment and even though it would not be serving its full potential it would have a tremendous effect on swaying the political opinion of the city. People may start to ask "when can our part of the city get a metro?" At the moment it is just tucked away in Snow Hill and although it is a great service it is not serving the heart of the city or providing the much needed link between the two major stations.
What an enclave of sanity! Why aren't you lot running this godforesaken city?
There's no need for me to say much as several people have summed things up perfectly on here.
I've recently returned from a trip to Germany, where all major cities have an extensive underground system.
As I conveniently navigated my way around these exciting subterranean stations using trams that arrived with amazing regularity both day and night, I imagined what it must be like to be a tourist in Birmingham, clutching a few dozen bus timetables and trying to work out how I'd find the next bus stop on a freezing cold winter evening. It was very depressing to realise that Birmingham really is a second-rate European city.
I'd just like to add to a point that someone else touched upon - funding for public transport should be a civic right of the people, something which enhances society and quality of life, not something which is based on the proviso that a sterile business plan can prove it to be a good money-making exercise.
Hi there, how are things? I just now shared this content with a colleague, there was a fantastic chuckle.
Hiya, I'm truly happy I have uncovered this particular expertise on keywordsgohere. Nowadays writers publish far too much on gossips and this is actually nerve-racking. A beneficial webpage with fascinating information, this is what I need. Thank you to keep this website, I'll be checking it regularly.
Are you sending newsletters? Can not find it.
I enjoyed the article about the android tablets, they move at such
a pace that it can be hard to keep up, the nexus
7 and 10 have the newest OS, but there are actually
many out there that have earlier versions of the OS, I thinks this post will help these people, as it's assisted me quite a bit. Thanks
モンブラン(MONTBLANC)は、洗練されたデザイン・きわめて高い品質・なめらかな書き心地を創立以来ずっと守ってきました。