The Future of the Web
I once met some whose job title was "futurologist", which was nice although not my favourite ever title. That was "imagination engineer", a position that didn't exist with Disney's Magic Kingdom but in the BBCs Education department. That one reeked of a title being given in lieu of pay, but looking into the future has become a little industry in itself.
Before every game of the European Championships this year some uncomfortable looking ex-pro was asked what they thought would happen in the next two hours. Given that they only had to focus on events within around 10,000 square feet of grass, with 23 people on it at any one time, they did -- as ever -- spectacularly poorly.
Weather forecasts have got more reliable over the years, as computing power and simulation models have improved, we can now pretty much trust predictions that don't involve humans. Maybe that's why weathermen (and women) don't become personalities any more -- we only remember them for getting it wrong.
But to try and predict anything that depends on human behaviour, and you're all but stuffed. No simulations can help, you can't foresee trends, and if you're trying to make even educated guesses on the future of the internet, that mass of interconnected humanity, then all I can say is "good luck".
Wired magazine, a magazine that does almost nothing but predict our techno-future gets it very wrong as often as not. Recently they've admitted to predicting the death of: commercial web publishing (April 1996), web browsers (March 1997), online song sharing (December 2002) and a few more where they could hardly have been wider of the mark.
If anyone does know, it ought to be inventor of the internet Sir Tim Berners-Lee, who I was lucky enough to hear speak on that very subject "The Future of the Web" last week. But he doesn't really do predictions and, if inventing the interwebs wasn't proof enough, that should confirm that he's a very clever man.
Sir Tim talked about two things, both of which he's working: on the Semantic Web, a complex system of making context links between data on the web that is at last looking near use, and a new academic discipline of Web Science.
Best described as a pulling together of the technology and the human, Web Science isn't about to predict anything but it does intend to help people to understand the unfathomably complex mesh of intelligence that you're staring at now (admittedly a fairly insignificant bit). The theory goes, if we can understand the internet then we may have a chance to shape it. Forget analysts predicting based on past behaviour, that's some power to wield.
But that's the future of the web itself -- the simple(ish) underlying technology -- what we'll actually use it for is almost completely unknown. Would you have predicted Facebook being a success? It's a sort of address book for people you don't want to talk to do, with the ability for grown-ups to send each other virtual drinks.
Would you have predicted that one of the internet stories of 2008 would be rickrolling? Not me, it's just a family friendly version of the trick link thing geeks have been doing for years.
The revival of the practical joke, years after even the French stopped finding clowns funny, if that's the sort of thing that's going to happen I'm not sure I want to know. So I'll ask a futurologist, or Alan Shearer.
Older/Newer
« Wearing a minskirt on Facebook | The (new?) place to see and be seen »
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The Future of the Web. TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.birminghampost.net/cgi-bin/mt421/mt-tb.cgi/14713


















Leave a comment