What's missing?
You've probably seen the adverts for Britain's Missing Top Model and if you haven't seen the first episode, check it out on the IPlayer. It's of course a rip off of America's Next Top Model but with the BBC twist- being politically correct to the point of craziness. The show is very similar in the way that girls battle it out each week in challenges to do with posing or interviews and then have a photo shoot with a set (usually warped) theme. At the end of the week there is a judging with some apparently important people in the fashion world and one potential model is eliminated, continuing until the last girl emerges as the winner.
We already have Britain's NTM on LivingTV, so the BBC have come up with the enlightening prospect of having eight girls with disabilities compete, hence the 'missing' model, a pun on some of the girls with missing limbs.
The show is a great platform to raise awareness for people with disabilities and as one girl put it, "I want to show people that wow, you can be disabled and pretty!" This same girl started crying at dinner, asking 'Why did this happen to us?' concerning their disabilities and another comforted her by saying, 'We all think that,' until one put plainly, 'I don't. I don't give a f*****g s**t.'
'I don't know if the public are ready for disabled models' seems to be a theme throughout the show. And there's a constant doubt whether they could ever achieve magazine covers like the model above or her success on major runways... Oh wait, the model above is Brenda Costa and she's been deaf her whole life. The Brazilian beauty is a face of Loreal and is now pregnant with her first child. Did she have any problems breaking into and being successful in the industry? Doesn't seem like it! Funny how there's two deaf girls in the competition. Also in Cycle 3 of America's Next Top Model a partially blind girl sailed to the top three.
It annoyed me throughout they show that it seemed such an original opportunity and that the world needs to be shown that girls with disabilities are beautiful too- don't they realise they're already in the media?! Even people who are in the fashion industry question whether they can 'make it' as a model because the business is so tough. Argh! One of the judges asks 'Do you think having a deaf model would make a difference to the industry?" Funny that there already is a deaf super model and you didn't even notice!
A judge comes out with 'I think it's really important that the disability is obvious in some way. I don't think there is any point in having a disabled model that no one knows is disabled.' Frankly that's quite shocking. Are they not entitled to a career as a model, plain and simple? Do you have to be a 'model with a disability' rather than a 'model' forever?
The thing is, the fashion industry is always looking for controversy, something different, something headline-seeking. If a model will sell clothes, then she will sell clothes, shes hired. Who's to say that if a girl in a wheelchair went to a casting with an exquisite face and and another girl just strolled in with an exquisite face, she would have the upper hand? I know face models, I know hand models. I've seen fashion shows for wheelchair users.
If Lily Cole had her arm missing would she be as successful? I guess these are the questions the programme raises. Would we look at this picture in a magazine and want to buy a product? This month sees an all black model issue of Vogue Italia. Could there be a time when there will be an all persons with disabilities issue?

















Very good post. Thanks.
I think there is an element of TV (yet again) playing catch up on an issue on the pretence of bringing it to the masses. The show's mixed messages are odd considering the Beeb is also behind the excellent Ouch disability blog.
I also can't help thinking that disability is the new black for the fashion industry - here today, long gone next season.
The judge's comment about the winning model needing to have an "obvious" disability is hugely offensive, it also conveniently ignores the very many "invisible disabled" people out there.
If my wife is having a bad day she'll venture out in the wheelchair and people react, by and large, as you would expect when confronted by someone with an obvious mobility problem. If she's feeling slightly better she'll go out with her walking stick and some recognise that she has some mobility limitations. But if she's having a very good day and walks unaided then she's just another person - even though the her chronic illness and pain has not gone anywhere and is still having a big impact on her.
She doesn't want or expect special treatment, just some awareness and understanding.
I'm not sure this BBC3 show achieves either of these. It feels a big wasted opportunity.
It's interesting that the judge who said the winner needs to be obviously disabled is a wheel chair user herself. Does that change your opinion?
I think the competition hasn't made their aims clear enough- to find a model or to find a role model, or to simply get photgraphs of someone in a wheel chair or with a missing limb in a fashion magazine? If they are aiming for modelling success, not every job will be for the purpose of raising awareness or proving a point, modelling is about selling a product.
Thanks for your comment! I'm so glad I touched on issues that were hopefully relevant and didn't waffle like usual!
Thanks for the response Selina.
The fact the judge is in a wheelchair herself is irrelevant to me and it doesn't alter my reaction to what she said.
I think you're spot on regarding the confused aims of the programme and that's why it feels a wasted opportunity.
(You don't waffle, you take us on a meandering journey with your words!)
well, at least it's marginally better than that show where they try to get people to confess secrets that would immediately get them divorced.