http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/

The West Midlands Police 'Dispatches' Scandal - Should someone be dispatched?

By James Treadwell on May 19, 08 04:28 PM in Crime

This is unfortunately a somewhat belated blog on events that unfolded before the high court last Thursday. Unfortunately I have only just had time to turn my attention to the scandalous conduct of our local West Midlands police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) that ultimately came to full light last week concerning the Dispatches programme 'undercover mosque'. On Thursday both groups issued a high court apology and agree to pay six-figure libel damages to company makers Hardcash and Channel 4 who first aired the programme in January 2007.

I know Roshan Doug has already written on the topic, but my focus is slightly different. I wanted to examine not the media, but the abysmal conduct of criminal justice bodies involved.

I watched the programme and found it gripping and shocking investigative journalism. To set the scene for anyone who did not see Dispatches (there is a link in here) had investigated a number of mosques run by high profile national organisations, almost exclusively all where adherents to Saudi influenced Wahabism - a variety of Islam that externally claimed to be dedicated to moderation and dialogue with other faiths, but behind closed doors preached something quite different. It was that which was the film highlighted, showing footage taken from covert filming. The footage demonstrated the most extreme forms of intolerance, bigotry and extremism. Those who watched the programme saw how firebrand preachers filmed without their knowledge told a mainly young male audience that Allah had created the woman deficient and 'needing' to be beaten for not wearing a hijab; that homosexuals should be thrown from the mountain to their deaths; and that the 'kuffaar' or (or non-believer) amounted to little more than dirt. They condemned the idea of integration into British society, painted British democracy as un-Islamic, and praised the Taliban for killing British soldiers.

All this should probably have elicited a response from the forces of law and order, and respond they did. But perhaps not in the way that readers might expect. West Midlands Police had referred the documentary to the broadcasting regulator, Ofcom and issued a joint statement with the crown prosecution service that stated that the police had asked the CPS to look at bringing a prosecution against the programme makers for stirring up racial hatred. It also accused the film makers of deception and selective editing - as last Thursday's court case showed, they were clearly out of order.

With the backing of Channel 4 the programme makers , Hardcash productions launched a libel action against the West Midlands police and the Crown Prosecution Service lawyer responsible for the slur on their work. Ultimately the film makers and broadcasters have triumphed and shown they were right all along, but that for me does not mean the end of the matter. Indeed, in my mind it is far from resolved.

The issue then is this so law enforcement was concerned with the conduct of the journalists - it saw them as fostering the racial hatred. That seems a little rich, just try a few exerts from one of the preachers featured in the programme:

'No one loves the Kuffaar! Not a single person here from the Muslims loves the Kuffaar. Whether those Kuffaar are from the UK or from the US. We love the people of Islam and we hate the people of Kuffaar. We hate the Kuffaar'

'Kuffaar' as already stated is a derogatory term for non-Muslims. The police and CPS suggest that comments like these were 'taken out of context'. Really? What conceivable context could make these quotes acceptable or reasonable? Oh, I'm sorry was it not a religious sermon - it was a debate on the merits of freedom of speech. Let's get real here!

It is pretty apparent to me that it was exactly the same stirring up hate context that the leader of the British National Party (BNP) suggesting that Islam is a 'wicked religion' (a remarks made by Nick Griffin filmed undercover by the BBC which lead to him being brought before a criminal court). The comments in 'undercover mosque' were no more out of context than were Griffins. Indeed the similarity is striking. It seems to me that both were made to inspire similar bigotry and hatred. Undercover mosque wasn't fake, it was real. Most scarily it was filmed in the most part in Birmingham Mosques. In the above case, it was the hatred being preached in the supposedly moderate Green Lane mosque in Birmingham.

Now I'm going to make clear here that bigotry is a problem for an array of organised religions, and Islam is not unique in having some who are intolerant and hate filled. But my piece is not about the programme or Islam as a faith. It so happens that it was comments made in a documentary on Islam, but the issue here is the police and criminal protection, sorry, crown prosecution service. Anyone following the case should be aware of the West Midlands Police's highly arrogant, irresponsible and sloppy handling of the whole affair. Since issuing the statement, both the CPS and police have point blank refused to explain themselves or provide any evidence to support their allegations, indeed, they have only apologised out of necessity because their own position was always ultimately totally untenable. Moreover, now we the taxpayer will foot the libel bill.

While there is perhaps real criminal incitement taking place, the police and CPS did nothing. Perhaps they are frightened of the Islam connection (As already highlighted, a quite different response was forthcoming after the BBC programme 'inside the BNP). Perhaps they were just too busy doing real policing work like referring a legitimate television programme to 'Ofcom' (an important policing priority that ranks up there with monitoring the big brother house). I for one think that the real damage to community relations was not the programme, but police ineptness, for here we have a fantastic display. The police action also hardly helps those moderate and progressive Muslims trying hard to show up such radical hard-line intolerance and drive the radicals influence down.

I'm going to do something here that hasn't yet been done, but make a call for a display of public sector accountability. Who thinks we should see a resignation from both the police and the CPS for their scandalous conduct? I would like to say, I do!

8 Comments

Roshan Doug said:

James, thanks for mentioning my piece here. Appreciate it... I've always felt there are double standards in the authorities' dealing with the extreme/radical elements withing muslim community in the UK. Everyone seems so sensitive... If it's unacceptable for the BNP - as it is, quite rightly - to call for hatred or death of a person or a group of people then surely it must extend to idiotic, intolerant Islamists as well. In my view, and like you, the police and the crown prosecution clearly got it wrong in this instance.

James Treadwell said:

Hi Paul

Tyou for the pointer. It is what happens when you don't check your blog propperly before posting. I shall change it but leave this as a note of incompetance.

James Treadwell said:

Hi Paul

Thank you for the pointer. It is what happens when you don't check your blog propperly before posting. I shall change it A.S.A.P but leave this as a note of incompetance.

sally doody said:

Has Paul Groves really got nothing better to do than make petty sarcastic comments that are not constructive and simply illustrate what a pathetic and puerile poor excuse for a journalist he is. It’s reminiscent of what my year 5 pupils come up with.

Paul Groves said:

James: Isn't it par for the course for the police especially, but also the CPS, to opt out of making satisfactory explanations for their decisions and actions?
Apologies tend to be qualified at best and rarely come with any sort of admission of failure.
There seems to be a belief - and an acceptance in some quarters - that the sort of accountability you are suggesting and which is evident in other organisations, simply doesn't apply for the police and CPS. Moreover, it shouldn't apply to them because of the "difficult nature" of their work.
I'm not sure we can realistically have too much confidence in such bodies dispensing justice when they adopt such a "do as I say, don't do as I do" attitude.
This whole story quickly descended to farcical levels and certain decisions and actions were triggered by various bogey words and phrases without too much thought given to what was actually happening. It is still a far from satisfactory conclusion.
Resignations? Possibly, but I'm not convinced it would actually lead to improvements and greater accountability.
Old habits die hard. New fears and prejudices seemingly die harder.


Sally: Yes I do.

JOHN ODDY said:

I read your post with interest, I watched the programme and at the time was disgusted by the racist comments and vile outbursts made by the Imams, Muslim religious leaders, an American speaker and also the Deputy Headmaster of a Muslim school.
When I read, a few days later, that the Police were reporting Channel 4 for broadcasting it I thought “This is PC gone mad”. This Country, at the moment, is bending over backwards to appease the Muslims, we are told they are a peaceful religion and that they want to integrate with us, Mosques Uncovered blew that thought right out of the water.
Now that the Police and CPS have admitted they were wrong and that it was not “selective editing” will they now be looking towards arresting and charging the Muslims involved with inciting racial hatred?, I doubt it, they will be too scared of upsetting the Muslim communities. That is “selective policing”.

clifford said:

What's 'incompetance'?

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

News authors

Olympic logo

Beijing Blog - Jo Green and Paul Phedon from Birmingham PR firm S&X Media give their account of being at the Beijing Olympics
Postings | Beijing Blog RSS feed Feed

The Big Debate

The Big Debate - Start the debate. Are our Young Leaders our Green Saviours? September 15, Hall 5 the ICC. Postings | The Big Debate RSS feed Feed

Simon Hadley

Simon Hadley - The Birmingham Post's picture editor
My postings | Simon Hadley's RSS feed My feed

Paul Dale

Paul Dale - The Birmingham Post's public affairs editor
My postings | Paul Dale's RSS feed My feed

Phil Davis

Phil Davis - Board member of Passenger Focus (rail transport passenger group)
My postings | Phil Davis's RSS feed My feed

James Treadwell

James Treadwell - Criminologist, Birmingham City University
My postings | James Treadwell's RSS feed My feed

Stef Lewandowski

Stef Lewandowski - Owner of digital design agency 3Form and part of Birmingham's Big City Plan
My postings | Stef Lewandowski's RSS feed My feed

Marc Reeves

Marc Reeves - Editor of The Birmingham Post
My postings | Marc Reeves's RSS feed My feed

Emma Brady

Emma Brady - The Birmingham Post's health correspondent
My postings | Emma Brady's RSS feed My feed

Shahid Naqvi

Shahid Naqvi - The Birmingham Post's education correspondent
My postings | Shahid Naqvi's RSS feed My feed

Jonathan Walker

Jonathan Walker - The Birmingham Post's political editor
My postings | Jonathan Walker's RSS feed My feed

Roshan Doug

Roshan Doug - Writer and political commentator
My postings | Roshan Doug's RSS feed My feed

Joanna Geary

Joanna Geary - Development Editor of The Birmingham Post.
My postings | Joanna Geary's RSS feed My feed

Tom Scotney

Tom Scotney - The Birmingham Post news reporter
My postings | Picture Archive's RSS feed My feed

Latest Birmingham Post Lifestyle blog

Lifestyle Blog

Birmingham Post staff and guest bloggers from the midlands give you the lowdown on what's happening in your region and some musings on culture in the UK and beyond.

Latest Birmingham Post Sport blog

Keep up to date

Sponsored Links