Council's "craven cowardice" over Metro extension
Birmingham City Council's failure to back unequivocally the Midland Metro extension from Snow Hill to Five Ways is not just extraordinary, it is verging on political incompetence.
Simply put, does the city's Conservative-Liberal Democrat leadership have any real wish to push ahead with the £180 million plan?
Legislation allowing track to be laid through the city centre is in place, but runs out next year.
All that is needed for the ambitious project to go ahead is for the Government to give financial commitment.
But, as is well known, Transport Ministers have fallen out of favour with trams and are doubtless looking for any excuse to deny Birmingham.
As is also well known, the Conservative half of the city council coalition has grave concerns about the wisdom of running trams through congested shopping areas such as Corporation Street, and the chaos this would cause during construction work.
Most Liberal Democrats, meanwhile, would far rather invest £180 million on improving the quantity and quality of bus services.
It is clear therefore, on a nod-nod, wink-wink basis, that a Government decision to pull the plug on the Five Ways extension would not be viewed by council leaders, privately at least, as a disaster. They are far more interested in negotiating with the private sector to run the Metro from Snow Hill to New Street and at some future stage on to Birmingham Airport.
There is no concerted campaign to rally the support of MPs behind the Five Ways Metro extension, as there was with the New Street Gateway project.
West Midlands Minister Ian Austin is not being harangued and challenged to hammer on the doors of the Department for Transport demanding that a Metro cheque wings its way to Birmingham asap.
There is absolutely no political hunger to make this happen.
Most people who are in the loop recognise that the Snow Hill-Five Ways option is simply being left to whither on the vine until the Government finally puts the project out of its misery.
Why is it, though, that council leader Mike Whitby cannot bring himself to explain what is going on - or in this case, what is not going on?
Speaking to the media in a live video link from Shanghai, where he was launching the Big City Plan, Coun Whitby knew he would be quizzed about the Metro. His advisers provided a form of words which they thought might satisfy journalists.
Fat chance of that.
Coun Whitby gave every impression of severe unease.
Asked whether the Snow Hill-Five Ways route remained the council's number one priority for a Metro extension if the money became available, he refused to answer. Relying on the age-old politician's get out, complaining about a "hypothetical" question, he simply would not respond.
But this is by no means a hypothetical question. A Government decision on funding the Metro extension must be made within the next year, and it craven cowardice for the council to sit on the fence in the hope that Ministers will do the dirty work - for which they will then doubtless be blamed for depriving Birmingham of a major regeneration project by the very councillors who at the moment show no enthusiasm for the Metro.
It really is a simple question: will the council build the Five Ways-Snow Hill extension if the money becomes available?
If not, what plans are being put in place to provide Birmingham with a first class transportation system?
Older/Newer
« Angry MP Complains About Being Silenced (In A Long Speech) | Are we all getting a Christmas bonus from the taxman? »
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Council's "craven cowardice" over Metro extension. TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.birminghampost.net/cgi-bin/mt421/mt-tb.cgi/93806











Is "craven cowardice" reported speech? If so, who said it?
Richard,
I described the council's actions, or no-actions, as craven cowardice.
You are quoting yourself? Pompous or what?
You are quoting yourself? Pompous or what?
Birmingham keeps pushing its business and conference credentials when the ICC, newly planned libary, entertainment district and new bus station are only accessable from New Street station via foot or taxi! A great example of a green jointed travel policy !!
More dirty poluting bus's or clean regular metro ? bit of a no brainer really!
I feel somewhat ashamed and embarrassed that I have for years been accusing the current administration of being solely responsible for neglecting the region's outdated transport network, when it now seems that the City Council is colluding with the Government in attempting to keep our transport infrastructure firmly stuck in the Dark Ages. Buses are fine for a small provincial town, but are totally inadequate for the second city. Time to wake up! We are already decades behind Manchester and all other comparable cities in the developed world. Tony Millinger