Liam Byrne's first task - defend the funding bias against English regions
Birmingham MP Liam Byrne has been handed a poisoned chalice in one of his first tasks as Chief Secretary to the Treasury.
The MP for Hodge Hill will appear before a House of Lords Committee to discuss the Barnett formula, which helps determine how public spending is allocated to the nations of the United Kingdom.
Unless the Government is about to announce a major change of policy, it means he will have to defend a system which means regions such as the West Midlands make do with less money for public services than Scotland - even though average wealth in Scotland is higher.
The system has been in place since 1978, so it's not new. But it's become increasingly controversial since Scottish devolution.
Older/Newer
« Cabinet Reshuffle List in Full | Martin Mullaney takes unusual vow of silence after joining the cabinet »
7 Comments
Leave a comment
Search the site
News authors
Jonathan Walker - The Birmingham Post's political editor
My postings |
My feed
David Kuczora - A PR consultant working in Birmingham and living in the 'burbs
My postings
Alister Scott - Professor of Spatial Planning and Governance, Birmingham City University
My postings
More on...
- Gordon Brown
- David Cameron
- birmingham city council
- Birmingham Council
- Mike Whitby
- Labour
- Liam Byrne
- Nick Clegg
- Tom Watson
- Liberal Democrats
- Ed Miliband
- sleaze
- John Hemming
- Birmingham City Council
- Eric Pickles
- planning
- Andrew Mitchell
- birmingham post
- expenses
- election
- Gisela Stuart
- mayors
- phone hacking
- birmingham
- leadership
Recent Posts
- David Kuczora: Suburban train dream derailed
- University Education should not be about filling buckets, it's about lighting a fire
- David Kuczora: Pragmatic policing to take Pride in
- David Kuczora: Queensway naming - true legend or urban myth?
- David Kuczora: It's time for me to come out
- Lord Feldman's dinner is repeating. Could yours?
- Compete or collude: can't our "business community" do both?
- Whatever Happened to Your Vote on Thursday?
- 'LEPing' forward in spatial planning in the Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership
- The week in Parliament: Birmingham schools, Stafford Hospital and immigration
- Permitted Development Proposals Get Themselves Into a Right Pickle.
- Britain needed Thatcher's "bravery and determination" says Stourbridge MP Margot James
- "I know which side I am on" - full text of Midland MP David Winnick's speech attacking Thatcher
- Full text of the Government's promise to reconsider press regulation laws and ensure small bloggers are excluded
- Do the politicians negotiating with Hacked Off know who funds them?
- Happy Birthday to the National Planning Policy Framework(NPPF)
- What the legislation says - most blogs are exempt from Leveson regulation
- Spending cuts have improved council services, says Eric Pickles
- Osborne backs Heseltine plans - Local Enterprise Partnerships to lead economic growth with billions of pounds diverted from Whitehall
- Government still hiding Romanian and Bulgarian migrant estimates - needs 60 days to decide whether publication is "in the public interest"
- Read the letter revealing Government plans to outsource fire services
- The Government does have predictions for immigration from Bulgaria and Romania but thinks it may be in the public interest to keep them secret
- 50 Conservative chairmen and activists back same-sex marriage - full list of names
- A Walk Down 2 West Midland High Streets in 2023
- Is Birmingham treated unfairly? A detailed look at Government funding for Birmingham City Council
- MP John Hemming asks: Should Prince Philip be King Philip?
- We don't need a mob-mentality
- An Ode to Economic Growth
- Channel 4's full video report on #plebgate and interview with Andrew Mitchell
- Eric Pickles: "Luvvies" complain about library closures
Latest Birmingham Post Business blog
Latest Birmingham Post Lifestyle blog
Latest Birmingham Post Science blog
Latest Birmingham Post Sport blog
Keep up to date
Technorati
Categories
We read...
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008






even Lord Barnett think the Barnett formula is past its sell-by-date. enough said.
English regions? You mean England. English regions are a recent invention of the UK Government, introduced against the will of the electorate. The North East of England, the only area allowed a referendum, voted 78% AGAINST breaking up England into regions. England is a nation in its own right, just like Wales and Scotland.
An analogy:
Dear English Football Association
As a representative of the Scottish Football Association, I would like to inform you that we wish to change the way the English Football team is managed to bring it more in line with the way our Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, is running Britain.
This will involve the following:
1. The Manager of the Scottish team is allowed to be involved with the running of the English team. However, the manager of the English team should have no say whatsoever in the running of the Scottish team. This shall be known as the West Lothian Question.
2. A sizable proportion of any money the English Football Association raises from, say sponsorship or crowd takings, shall be given to the Scottish Football Association, regardless as to whether you need it or not. This does not apply the other way round. This is known as the Barnett Formula.
3. You are not to call yourself England any longer. You will now be known as the British Regions. We, on the other hand, are still to be known as Scotland, âÂÂa proud and noble nationâÂÂ.
4. Medical treatment to your players will be limited to a few treatments because of cost. No such stringent limitation applies to Scotland.
5. If your playing surfaces are flooded, then do not expect much assistance. However, Scottish pitches will be adequately provided for in the event of flooding.
6. From this moment on, the English Football Association will cease to exist. However, the Scottish Football Association will be allowed to continue to work independently.
A failure to follow these rules will see you branded as arrogant, selfish and unfair.
IâÂÂm sure you will find this to your satisfaction. After all, you seem to be happy with this state of affairs with your political system, so why not your Football team?
Yours sincerely
Mr G Brown.
PS You English are so naïve, you are being abolished and donâÂÂt even realise it.
I don't remember voting for these "English regions".
Yes the Barnett Formula needs to be scrapped. I can see no possible reason why a Scottish life is considered worth ã1600 more per year than an English life.
But we also should get rid of these artificial "English regions". As far as I'm concerned, England is one nation and until the people of England vote otherwise it should remain so.
Those Barnett figures again:
These are the latest figures for funding per person across the UK
Northern Ireland ã9,577
Scotland ã9,032
Wales ã8,493
England ã7,426
The English are the bottom of the pile. Fourth class citizens in their own country.
There are no english regions! There is one England!
You anti English bigots would do well to remember the normans. Contrary to myth, the normans never conquered the English. We are still here; they are where? There is no norman language, currency, or state!
I expect Byrne to do everything he can to avoid talking about the issue. What else can he do? He cannot possibly defend it.
The Barnett formula clearly needs reviewing as it is unfair(there is an interesting cpontribution today in the form of the Calman report... although disappointingly it seems to suggest that Barnett should stay for now).
On another issue, the Normans did fundamentally change governance, despite what M Andesron says above. Before the Normans, for example, Anglo-Saxon kings were often elected (yes elected...). The Normans also doled out large chunks of land to those who supported them... chunks of which has been passed down through the centuries and is still with rich landowners...
As far as subsidy to Wales is concerned remember this - COLONIES DON'T COME CHEAP!!!