http://blogs.birminghampost.net/news/

Why the Birmingham Post must change

By Marc Reeves on Aug 25, 09 06:17 PM in Editor

I have just announced to my staff that Trinity Mirror was starting a consultation process with them over the future of the Birmingham Post, the title I have edited for more than three years.

There are two options for change on the table - each a response to the fact that the Midlands region of Trinity Mirror will lose £6 million next year unless some radical action is taken now. The Post as a key title must play its part in plugging that profit gap, and I'll get to the two options later.

This consultation process is unique in my experience in that as well as seeking the views of staff - who are of course the people most directly affected by any changes - we also want the views of readers and advertisers. Launches and relaunches of newspapers always involve market research and testing, of course, but rarely do publishers open up the decision making process as early - and as transparently - as we are doing with the Post.

I think that's a mark of the special role the Post plays in the life of the Midlands. No other region in the UK has a daily paper that gives as much quality coverage to business, politics and the arts as does the Post. In its own little way, the title is one of the many unique attributes of the West Midlands, and one that is highly prized as a result.

Readers have an almost fanatical allegiance to the Post, and any changes are met with the kind of reaction that I've rarely seen in any of the newspapers I've worked for over more than 20 years. It's because of this fierce sense of ownership that I think it's absolutely the right thing to do to give the whole region a say in what could be the most important decision for the Post in its 151-year history.

Here, I want to set out why we need to change and describe what we think are the best options, so you can respond with your views and help us make the right decision.

But first, what's the problem and why to we need a big change? Behind the stark financial picture I painted earlier lies a complex set of changing circumstances that makes the current recession particularly painful for any business in the media - and especially so for the regional press. What's more, when the UK emerges from the financial downturn, by no means all of our old sources of revenue will return to 'normal'. We make most of our money from advertising, which is fuelled by the marketing budgets of other businesses. When recession bites, these are the first lines to be cut, and we've seen serious and sustained declines, particularly job and property advertising. In the Post's case, the catastrophic hits sustained by the financial and the commercial property markets have been reflected directly in the amount of advertising we see from these sectors. Given their significance for the Post, this has been a very painful change indeed.

At the same time, however, the very structure of the advertising market has fundamentally changed, with total advertising on the internet overtaking the regional press for the first time this year. While the Post's very successful online service is lauded as one of the best in the regional press, it's competing for audience attention and advertising pounds with everyone from the BBC, Telegraph Online and Google to local blogs, Ebay and niche business sites. Just a few years ago, our competition consisted of nearby rival newspapers and a few radio stations. Now we compete with the world. We're gaining a lot of online advertising, but not at a rate to replace our declining print advertising.

Last year's radical change - we switched from a broadsheet to a compact format, and scrapped the Saturday edition - was a response to that challenge, but such is the depth of the recession, one that wasn't radical enough to ensure the survival of this great title.
So what could a new Birmingham Post look like , one to weather the recession and emerge equipped to thrive in the new media world?
The facts: our biggest expenses are staff and manufacturing costs. Any change that doesn't reduce either or both of these areas simply won't plug the profit gap, so our approach is to look at reducing the overall number of pages printed per week. With each page lost, you reduce the absolute cost of the ink and paper - and also the work that goes into producing the content, and hence the labour cost. We've therefore looked at reducing the size of the paper on an average day, or reducing the number of days per week on which we publish. The somewhat zanier ideas that we rejected early on included total closure, a merger with the Birmingham Mail, or even going bi-weekly.

We're now left with two options, each of which result in broadly the same improvement of the profit position of the Post, but are at opposite ends of the spectrum.
In the first option, the daily pagination of the Post would be reduced to just 40 or 48 pages per day, including Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, when we currently regularly exceed 60 pages. Because of the need for savings, many of those pages will need to rely more on contributed content and national stories from agencies than is currently the case, and the local flavour will therefore be diluted.

The second option is to move to a weekly model - probably publishing on Thursdays - with a much bigger edition of around 96 pages at its core, plus commercial supplements and sections such as Post Property and Living magazine.

The first option retains more editorial jobs than the weekly model, but will result in my view in a much weakened brand because the paper will represent less value for money for the reader, day-by-day.

The weekly model will provide a much more comprehensive package of information, entertainment and advertising, and I believe will do more to preserve the brand values of the Post, and therefore offer a more sustainable future for the title. We think we will be able to retain most of the essential elements that exist in the current model and incorporate them in a weekly Post.

For the weekly model, we are even forecasting a modest circulation increase, based on the recent experiences of daily papers that have gone weekly.

Cards on the table? I believe the weekly model is the best option for the Post. There's a lot of emotion connected to the supposed status of being a daily paper and many of my contacts in the city regularly state baldly to me that 'Birmingham simply must have a daily business paper'. But at what cost? Increasingly, our diet of daily and immediate news is fed by online services and broadcast media, and newspapers have a much reduced role in bringing news we didn't hear first somewhere else. Papers are increasingly more about providing analysis, comment and insight.
I believe that should be the role of the Post in print - to explain and examine the big decisions and issues in the region, while keeping readers up to date with the immediate through our website and other online services.

A substantial, value-for-money weekly package is surely the best home for this, where the very best elements of the Post's coverage can be found all in one place.

That's my view anyway. There will be many others that take a very different position, I'm sure, and I genuinely want to hear as many views on this as possible.

128 Comments

Ursula said:

Letter to the Editor


Sir,


(Marc, you have no idea how much pleasure typing the above two lines give me.)


You are spot on in your analysis. With our own local daily I see the same problems. I'd breathe a sigh of relief if they'd condense themselves to a weekly. In an age when we are flooded with information coming at us from all sides of media less is more. Not just for the reader, but surely the writing contributors too: Better to brew a strong broth than to serve a daily watered down version.


Where that'll leave revenue I don't know. Yet, surely, it's a case of "Don't ask what the reader can do for the paper but what a paper can do for its readers". (Reeling them in no less - including advertisers since they'll only have that once-a-week window).


Plenty more to say. I wish you luck.


U

A good piece of analysis, but I do not think it goes far enough. There is a third option. It is time for your owners to return the paper to local ownership, as is being currently proposed with The Scotsman. In order to relieve The Post from the fiscal burdens of being part of the Trinity Mirror empire.

A new local owner is likely to be as with football clubs a local businessman, such as an estate agent or developer, who is anxious to promote the interests of Birmingham, as was the case in the 19th Century for many local papers.

Gary Cousins said:

I am very sorry to read that things have got as bad as this. However, as you say, the advertising spend in property and recruitment is at a real low at the moment. There is also the fact that more and more people are looking to the internet to get their news.


Is there more you can do online? For one thing, I would be prepared to pay a subscription for a good (improved) online regional newspaper. Would a subsription service be feasible, coupled with the online advertising income?


Anyway, as far as your options are concerned, I would much prefer a weekly but higher quality product than a daily but reduced quality one. I think the strength of the Post has been its local coverage and it would be a real shame if this were diluted.


Gary Cousins
Cousins Business Law
www.business-lawfirm.co.uk

Anonymous said:

Simply can't imagine a world without the Post in printed form - so whatever shape it takes and Marc Reeves is in the best place to know what that needs to be - then so be it.

But the mention of subscriptions by Gary above sparked a thought. Can't we (businesses in the West Midlands region) help save the Post ourselves - maths never was a good point so don't know how the sums would add up but wouldn't we all be more than willing to pay 2-3 times the current daily cost of the paper to see it survive (and in printed form too) via a subscription.
It's a nationally respected paper. Getting any mention in there has always been the holy grail of regional coverage for businesses and has been instrumental in the launch of many successful companies I've no doubt over the years.
Quite simply businesses in the West Midlands region need the Post. We must fight to see it survive.

C, Birmingham

Blair Kesseler said:

Good, well thought out and thought provoking piece. Just what I expect from the Post, Marc!
The truth is the world moves on. Even me, as a near pensioner, get my news feed from the internet maybe five times a day, never mind radio and TV. What I want from the Post is local depth, good business coverage, connection with the life of the region (including the charitable sector - don't let Thrive go!)
I have no doubt that you can provide that on a weekly basis - and get a few more readers on the way.
Having been through downsizing in previous careers I can feel for the staff who will be worried about their futures. However, Birmingham needs a serious paper and if the model that works is weekly - then best of luck

Janette Rawlinson said:

Endorse the option to go weekly but better quality local/regional stories. who else and where else can we fly the flag for local/regional business and its achievements when so much central/national policy and reporting downcries the vital work carried out in this region in wealth creation, manufacturing and service sector?
we all need to say what can we do to help solve the problem before it's too late and we lose our very important recognisable publication which gets out local issues quickly.
given new apps on i-phones and blackberries etc, how about a headline subscription service or feeder/teaser headlines to tempt us to the weekly publication?
this paper is read on trains and planes leaving the region for other parts of the country and internationally and often carries important messages to farflung interested parties, we do need to take some ownership/interest as others have said.
great idea to consult widely before taking action. as Ursula said, better to have less but good quality than information overload and overwhelm.

Janette Rawlinson said:

Endorse the option to go weekly but better quality local/regional stories. who else and where else can we fly the flag for local/regional business and its achievements when so much central/national policy and reporting downcries the vital work carried out in this region in wealth creation, manufacturing and service sector?
we all need to say what can we do to help solve the problem before it's too late and we lose our very important recognisable publication which gets out local issues quickly.
given new apps on i-phones and blackberries etc, how about a headline subscription service or feeder/teaser headlines to tempt us to the weekly publication?
this paper is read on trains and planes leaving the region for other parts of the country and internationally and often carries important messages to farflung interested parties, we do need to take some ownership/interest as others have said.
great idea to consult widely before taking action. thanks for the consideration, Mark.

dinkey said:

I'm sorry, but with all due respect, this isn't consultation and these aren't appropriate options. This is a patronising PR exercise to soften up readers on behalf of Trinity Mirror who have already decided what to do. It's clear that you will be keeping your job either way unlike many of your colleagues.


Trinity Mirror have completely mismanaged their whole Midlands newsprint and internet operation. They paid over the odds for buying the titles which are now worth less than a tenth of what they borrowed. They are trying to squeeze too much out of the titles to pay back the banks, and with a complete absence of a coherent internet strategy and lack of core investment, no wonder the Post is in trouble. Trinity Mirror has not adapted but simply been using the same old business model and now blames the competition, falling advertising revenues and the internet.


I can't believe the naivety of the writers of the previous comments who have swallowed the diversionary tactic.


Don't get me wrong, I think you, Marc Reeve, have done a great job editing the Post with the limited resources you've got, and continued to produce a terrific newspaper. And I'm sure the web team do the best with the miserable platform they've got (which is certainly not lauded by anyone I know).


More and more the editorial and sales teams of the Guardian and Telegraph seem to be primarily focused on web activity, where the new markets and revenues lie and their newspapers almost seem to be secondary to the core internet business. Trinity Mirror just doesn't seem to 'get it'.


Birmingham is supposed to be England's second city and it will no longer have a quality daily newspaper (it never got the chance of a decent news website). The really big loser here will be the business community throughout the West Midlands who rely on the Post.


It is disappointing that the editor has chosen to side against his Midlands readers (and staff) in this way and align himself to the London parent group's thinking which has clearly no interests but its own in mind.


It would seem that in the apparent cost saving measure to move out of the City centre to Fort Dunlop, the Post and Mail lost its Birmingham heart and loyalty. It also lost £9.3million in the failed property deal - more mismanagement?


The honourable thing here would be to support your readers and marshall support to maintain a daily title and reinvent the Post for the internet era. The other honourable option would be to resign and let someone else fight the corner for Birmingham and the Midlands. But please don't just roll over and accept this and dress-up two bad options in eloquent tosh and pretend its consultation.


Vern Topper said:

Weekly would be fine by me, but please let us have a digital download Thursday edition, with a quarterly subscription payable via PayPal. The wider West Midlands business reader doesn't see the paper edition of the Birmingham Post in the newsagents - but would quite like to download and read it, adverts and all, in the format for which it was intended.

Praguetory said:

This isn't surprising. Like the rest of the newspaper industry your masters failed to spot that the sluggish growth under New Labour was itself unsustainable - and we're supposed to read your paper for analysis?

If you're serious about cutting staff costs, I would happily submit articles reporting on what's really happening in Birmingham politics for free. By the way, have you seen the state of your online forum?

Has a joint print / electronic subscription model (cf the FT) been explored and discarded?

David Clarke said:

I've said it before: Birmingham would be a poorer place without the Post. And therefore, all of us should do all we can to retain it. But we also need to be realistic.

We are in a different world where we access our information differently and indeed keep in touch differently. The recession is not the sole cause of the decline in circulation and ad revenue: it has though, been the accelerator.

The changes made recently - cutting Saturday and going tabloid - have evidently not been sufficient to reduce costs and halt declining circulation. But they have ensured that the Post remains in the public eye and continues to play its part in the life of the city. The question is, will a weekly format (long-mooted and seemingly the management preferred option) be sufficient to preserve the Post's contribution? I suspect not.

A more fundamental change is needed and whilst playing around with the publishing model might help, it’s the business structure that really needs to change.

So, the ideal steps, as I see them without access to the figures, would be:

1. Bring it back (together with the Mail and possibly some of the weekly titles) into local ownership. Writing off the debts and loans associated with the titles might enable it to at least stabilise its position. A management buy-out/buy-in, on terms that enable the business to be sustainable, should once again be considered. But even that may not be sufficient.
2. Significantly improve the on-line Post-by-subscription offering. Promote it hard. Make it impossible to work or live in Birmingham without it.
3. Accept that the printed daily version, in common with many other papers, may well disappear in due course although a weekly (even monthly) printed title might survive.

Whatever happens, the Post is too important to lose. And there hasn’t been a mention of the Mail


Marc Reeves said:

Thanks for all the comments and challenges so far. As there'll hopefully be many more through today, I'm intending to respond at the end of the day.

The Edditer said:

I don't live in Birmingham (my home is Bloxwich, near Walsall, in the Black Country) but I can see the sense in changing the Birmingham Post to a more substantial weekly paper, if high standards are maintained. A good daily LOCAL news website would complement this, albeit it would reach only a minority of the brummie readership.


However, on past experience of how the once-mighty Walsall Observer was run down and desperately diluted over many years, then closed in unseemly haste with almost 150 years of heritage and goodwill discarded like so much chip paper without a thought for the town, I say BIRMINGHAM BEWARE. This may be the future of your favourite local paper.


Newspapers which are not published in their home towns can never truly be at their heart.

Tony Taylor said:

I would very much miss the "feel" of a paper Post, but can see from the general malaise throughout the newspaper market that it seems no one is prepared to pay to advertise - in this medium - however judging by the "pop ups" on Google, etc - perhaps there would be a sustainable income stream if the "paper" went internet based. I do wonder whether it's an age thing? do young people read papers? Are they naturally going to die out as my age group does (57 on 9/11)? Personally I can think of nothing worse than taking my lap top to the loo for a few minutes read - I don't even have the internet at home - much to Eliabeth chagrin - I have square eyes as it is without having 7 day a week access! After John Cranage's article talking up the stock market yesterday- I did wonder if I was living on some parallel planet - as mostly I get doom and despondency from the "local" business community and if you are going to report more national issues it takes the whole reason for buying local away - I want strong local news reporting - I get the national stuff (presently) free on line, but would have no objection to a subscription based LOCAL newspaper - whatever happens please keep going - I've been reading the Post for 50 years! Good luck Marc and thanks for engaging the readership.

David Bailey said:

Thank you, Marc, for just an open-minded approach and for the way you have asked for views on what is a much loved Midlands 'institution'.

I feel greatly for the staff at the Post who do such a good job and face uncertain times. However, the world is changing and it's difficult to see how a daily paper can survive.

Of the options you outline, I'd prefer a rich, hard-hitting weekly paper I can look forward to reading than a skimpy daily with a lot of bought-in content. I hope that the web version would be updated regularly, though.

One final point - I often receive a freesheet from the City Council advertising hundreds of council jobs - why can't the council put this advertising through local papers including the Post? I would financially help a key part of local democracy that helps hold politicians to account. Just a thought. Good luck!

David Bailey said:

Thank you, Marc, for just an open-minded approach and for the way you have asked for views on what is a much loved Midlands 'institution'.

I feel greatly for the staff at the Post who do such a good job and face uncertain times. However, the world is changing and it's difficult to see how a daily paper can survive.

Of the options you outline, I'd prefer a rich, hard-hitting weekly paper I can look forward to reading than a skimpy daily with a lot of bought-in content. I hope that the web version would be updated regularly, though.

One final point - I often receive a freesheet from the City Council advertising hundreds of council jobs - why can't the council put this advertising through local papers including the Post? I would financially help a key part of local democracy that helps hold politicians to account. Just a thought. Good luck!

Mr O said:

Marc

Your brave attempt at trying to re-arrange the deckchairs on the Titanic is as touching as it is naive.

I understand, as a manager, you have to maintain the corporate position. From your own point of view, you well know your own position is as much at risk as any of your colleagues.

The point is, it doesn't really matter what you do. Go weekly. Lose 30% of your editorial staff. What you're doing in effect is slowly winding down a medium that is no longer relevant and can't make any money.

In short, the Post won't be around in 2012, and you're deluding yourself if either your pitifully tiny readership or small band of ex-advertisers are going to be marching through the streets of Brum in protest.

Business is business. And your model has been a busted flush for at least 10 years. I know it. You know it. And management have known it for years.The problem has always been the method of execution.

All the recession has done is bring the model's inherent failings into sharp focus. Online dominates, news is a free commodity and you haven't figured out where revenues are going to come from in the digital age.

If newspapers had never existed and you pitched the idea today to Theo, Duncan, Peter, Debra et al, you'd be laughed out the Den before you'd even finished your speech.

It's time to let go and move on. The world changes and you need to change with it.

If that means abandoning the sinking ship, then so be it and good luck to you and those that will lose their jobs.

Maybe it's time to keep your eyes wide open and network like hell.

Best wishes

Have blogged http://bit.ly/FkR79 on how the Post must change, but agree with Marc on the weekly option. But it must be supported by further online investment, better exploitation of the brand and a high quality threshold for analysis and comment.
I welcome and applaud Marc's leadership to date and trust in his commitment to genuine consultation on the big question. It could be said the current state of the Post is in part due to too much comment and not enough contribution - now's the time to participate in the debate.

Foz B. said:

However much I cannot dispute the problems outlined in the posting and whilst I know nothing around running a newspaper – I can't help but think that the two “options” are a negative response, where a positive one is needed.

Thinning the title and padding it out with more syndicated content is a tactic that has already been used over the years – and is a reason why several people I know, who'd read the paper for years, stopped parting with their cash. We know that change was forced by finances, not because of a lack of will or talent by the people on the paper – but, already 70p can be a big ask on lighter days.

A weekly just seems against all logic. You can't compete against more instantaneous news sources, so you'll go in the opposite direction and give us news LESS frequently. Yes, yes, you'll say it'll be quality over quantity – but it'll be very out of date before it gets to us. I already find it annoying to pay for a paper and read what I did the day before somewhere else. Weekly exclusives and expert analysis you say? Hmmmm.

Then there's the claim that the Post website will continue apparently as normal. Well only a mug will believe that. Management types will surely staff the post as a weekly, not a daily – so there won't be the people to produce the regular content we love.

Saving by cutting will only work if it comes from genuine efficiency savings – this is cutting the product to pieces. A weakened daily, or an out of date weekly and a website highly unlikely to be of the same quality as today. This is a company giving the paper a slow death so that they can say in political circles that the “tried everything”.

I dare say that any comment not about the two “options” is pointless – as in so many situations, the decision has been made by management types. The weekly idea was floated weeks and weeks ago – it's clearly the one that has been thrashed out in detail. A consultation process isn't really a consultation process if you put two options you've already thought of on the table as the only discussion point.

However, as I said – this is a time for POSITIVE action, not cutting our beloved institution to bits.

When the Post relaunched, I had an idea that I didn't dare share for fear of being shouted down, but since things are this bleak, I'll voice my crazy idea.

Why is it called the “Birmingham” Post?

The content may be focused on “Birmingham”, but it is certainly not limited to it. I live in Birmingham, but I regard as what's going on in the Black Country/Coventry/North Warwickshire/South Staffs (etc) to be of relevance to my 'local area'. Heck, even Herefordshire and Worcestershire are part of the regional (not county) definition of the West Midlands....and the Worcestershire border isn't far down the road!

I somehow doubt that a publication called “Birmingham” gets the readership it could in those outlying areas – there are parochial tendencies in the West Midlands.

I'd rather have a wider regional paper, than a more local one with mostly national content. If I was outside of Birmingham, I'm sure I'd be more likely to buy something that didn't appear less relevant to me by the headline name at the top.

I'd like a daily paper for the West Midlands please......with MORE coverage of the region and a WIDER MARKET to sell it to.

I guess the Post might already claim to be a paper of the West Midlands, not just Birmingham – but with that name and fewer and fewer staff mining stories, you just can't be!

There's even more potential to expand the Post's reach too. The paper hugs the tiny group of “professions”, the lawyers, the accountants and the property moguls – but what's the biggest business group in the West Midlands? By a country mile it's the small and medium sized business segment. Sure, they're a fragmented bunch – but my goodness, if anyone needs a strong local media source, it's this group. They don't all wear suits and attend wine bar events, but they're a big audience producing a lot of news and in need of a big central voice. Surely?

Secondly, the Post, to me at least, doesn't really seem to reflect the region that I see. Oh goodness, anything to do with race is tricky ground, but maybe it is a little white middle class from hugging those suited professions so much? It's no wonder lots of people who could buy it don't buy it.

Quite honestly, when the Post “relaunched” in it's new format, I did wonder what possible impact that could have. It was the same paper with smaller pages and a new layout. I'm sure that the only people who noticed that were the existing readers – and it didn't change anything really. Same old business problems in a smaller size.

I do like the new format by the way – much easier to handle – but, was hardly the tonic to save the day.

I don't share the view that papers are dead, there's a techno elite who assume that all the world is connected to the internet and cares about it as much as they do. Perhaps in time, the paper format will go – but you cannot at present lay all the blame at the internet. Lack of relevance to a wider audience is a problem not caused by the internet.

If the cuts proposed go ahead, I cannot foresee this as being a transition to full digital anyhow. It's a politically correct way to kill the paper. If you cut editorial staff based on cuts to the printed publication – the website won't have the quality to be worth tuning into.

So I'd make an appeal to Trinity Mirror slashers to take off their tin hats, stop hiding in bunkers with their white flags ready to give it all up – and look at the POSITIVE opportunities to use the talents at the Post & Mail (or whatever name you are this week) to GROW.

Growth is possible. “The Post” - Business & Lifestyle News for The West Midlands Region. If Trinity Mirror don't have the will......let's hire some portakabins somewhere and do it ourselves :)

Paul McSweeney said:

I think turning the paper into a weekly paper would be a mistake. It would lose its prestige instantly and you would lose your most important market. ..the business community. How could you expect to serve the business community with information that is 3 or 4 days old..markets move fast:)
I would: Lessen the page count as you suggest. Focus solely on the business community with a local sports section. This is where your value is. Everything else can be acquired online..editorial comment, sudoku etc. If sourcing articles means a reliance upon contributed content and is therefore a cost, abandon it.

40 pages, focus on the business community in Birmingham (where you are the market leader) - charge £1 per issue. Supplements - 1 business oriented supplement per month - make it competitive and valuable to advertise in the supplement by increasing the relevance and lessening the frequency of the supplements; thereby increasing your revenue from advertising in each supplement.
Target what you are good at; and then the advertising will be more defined and therefore you can charge more.

Paul McSweeney said:

By the way, how much would it cost to buy the Birmingham Post?

Simon Jenner said:

I am not convinced by the two options they are both very defeatist. It's at times like this that a positive innovative approach is required. For the post to go weekly in my opinion would be the death nail, the main value of the post is its ability to report the news as it happens over the week.

Business people pick this up to understand the business environment in the midlands on a daily basis. I think you will find that other sources (on-line and off) suddenly plug the gap between weekly issues of the post which will eventually lead to the post no longer having a valued position in the market.

Would the Post be profitable stand alone paper outside of Trinity Mirror? If so is a sale an option?

I think the business community of the west midlands must keep the post and must keep it daily. There will be a way to make this work and I think a campaign for local businesses to have at least 1 copy for their reception is a great starting place.

chris said:

In answer to Paul McSweeneys question the obvious answer is just 70 pence.

And if more people put their hand in their pockets for that each morning instead of reading the shared copy in the office and bewailing its potential loss because 'it is so important to Birmingham', we probably wouldn't be having this discussion now.

Mary said:

I agree with Paul Sweeney's comments, "Focus solely on the business community with a local sports section".
By choosing to downgrade the sports coverage when you went compact, you missed an opportunity to tap into a unique market for sales - Midlands business people who are interested in local sports particularly football, cricket and rugby.
Actually I believe that if the Midlands football teams started winning things The Post's circulation and thus revenue would have been far higher!
My suggestion is that The Post looks for a local buyer - one who values local business and sport.

JP said:

Is the demise of The Birmingham Post really that much of a surprise? Can it wholly be blamed on the recession or the current management? It seems to me that one of the, (if not the), biggest lame ducks in British daily newspaper publishing has had more than a fair innings to prove that it warrants a place in that market, and for one reason or another has failed to do so.

Observer said:

Chris is precisely right. The way in which Birmingham's professional community sells the Post short by having just a few office copies that do the rounds is shameful. Help the paper put on another 10,000 sales and its problems will disappear.
One other thing needs to be said - the Post has suffered, along with most other newspapers, both regional and national, from under-investment in editorial content. Newspapers should contain news, and in the case of regional newspapers it should, in the main, be regional news. Constantly cutting staff erodes the volume and quality of a newspaper's content - something that advertisers acknowledge by keeping their chequebooks closed, and that readers recognise by cancelling subscriptions.
Trinity Mirror should be spending its way out of this crisis - although I won't hold my breath.
As to the business and professional community assuming control of the Post, the idea is too half-baked to consider. Imagine the difficulties of trying to unravel the Post's pension scheme from Trinity Mirror, or providing access to newspaper library facilities - without which no paper can survive - that are no longer held locally but are digitally stored in London.

This is a desperately sad decision, and I'm afraid desperately flawed. Marc, your article today spoke passionately about the loyalty of the readership of the Post, yet moving from a daily to a weekly paper could only destroy that loyalty. It cannot possibly work.

One of the unique benefits of Birmingham is its quality daily newspaper. Changing from a broadsheet, and focusing on business was a brave and right move. The Post is now a good paper, and relevant too. It critical if you really want to know what is happening in local and regional business, politics, and opinion forming society. Yes we can get much of this online, but not in such a compact and intelligent format. So, lets save the Post!

Clearly revenue streams have been challenged in recession, but the green shoots are showing and those streams of income should recover if the readership can be maintained and developed.

If there must be change, why not merge with the (frankly awful) Mail. Lets keep a quality daily paper for Birmingham, raise the standard of the Post and Mail as a merged title, retain the invaluable business pages, and John Bright, and leave the cheaper tabloid market of an evening paper for the underwhelming Express & Star.

Ben said:

As a number of people have suggested, there is a collective responsibility in the city and wider region to see that the Post survives as a vital place for the discussion of business, democracy and cultural life. The figure of £6m seems miniscule when compared to the tens of millions the city regularly squanders on its (disfunctional) marketing operations.

In the current climate of generally declining newspaper sales it seems inevitable that the paper should shift increasingly towards the internet (where the Post needs to make a lot of improvements in my opinion). Maintaining a weekly printed edition probably makes sense, but without daily sales where is the paper going to get revenue from? My understanding is that the current model of internet newspapers (ie relying on online advertising) is not working and incredibly successful online papers such as the Guardian are hemorrhaging cash.

The worst thing would be if a shift to a weekly format simply represented another step along the route to ultimate closure. This would be a disaster for Birmingham. In the 19th century J. Chamberlain dragged this town kicking and screaming into the modern era, and turned it into a true 'city' in the process. I very much fear that a city the size of Birmingham with only a weekly edition of its main newspaper risks slowly slipping back towards its rather parochial and unambitious origins.

Any way, in conclusion to a rather rambling post, is there anything the business community can do to help actively secure the future of the paper? The circulation of the Post in a city with a population of almost a million has always struck me as shockingly low. Could businesses increase their subscriptions from one copy to two? The importance of the paper to the local economy and culture cannot be over-stated.

Paul McSweeney said:

Re: Chris' comments above,

I meant to buy the business as a whole; not just a copy!
Another problem is regarding the shared copy in the office..you can go walk into any decent hotel in town and pick up a free copy...if, as I believe, the future is local business and sports focus, free copies to passing residents are of no value to the business model. They are hardly likely to pick up a copy..go home..and subscribe.

Paul

Ben said:

Excellent post from Foz B.

The question of how to appeal to the region is an interesting one. I fear dropping the 'Birmingham' might dent city-based sales too much, but then what is there to lose?

I believe the Western Morning News (based in Plymouth but sold across the South West region) is quite successful in reaching precisely this regional demographic. As far as I am aware it is also doing relatively well compared to some other local papers.

Birmingham desperately needs to see itself (and be seen by others) as capital of a city-region, as it is only at this scale of ambition that the city and the wider area can punch above its weight at a national and international level.

The sense that the BP doesn't represent the true cultural diversity of the city and region is also another point well put. I suspect the paper's failure to properly address and appeal to a wider, less homogeneously white readership is a significant factor in its long-term decline.


Mark Anslow said:

As a daily reader of the Birmingham Post, who whilst picking up online content admits to preferring the ‘feel’ of a paper I have to admit I am concerned that your preference for a weekly paper will completely change the style and content of the publication and, as a result, you risk alienating a large proportion of the current readership.


As I understand it the Birmingham business community is the largest audience of the publication in its current form and I feel that by changing to a weekly, the Post will be unable to properly service this key group of readers appropriately.


Each morning I read the Birmingham Post and the FT which gives me a local, national and international flavour of the day’s business and news. After speaking with colleagues and acquaintances in the city it is evident that it is this daily dose of real time breaking regional business content in the Post which resonates most with the core readership. I firmly believe that this is the fundamental reason why it is your paper which is found on the reception desk of every Birmingham business.


The Birmingham Post allows business men and woman to pick it up in the morning and scan the latest regional business highlights and refer relevant stories to colleagues. Without the immediacy of a daily paper this activity will no longer happen and I expect the value of the paper’s subscription to many businesses will decline.


That said you clearly have significant financial issues to address and therefore changes are required. Why not drop the Monday issue, (considering very little business is done over the weekend) reduce the remaining four issues per week to a more concise business focussed 40 pages and put the price up10p. Would this achieve a similar financial result? If so this would certainly be my preference.


Although I can see the value of a weekly, more insightful publication which has a bigger focus on features and wider comment that is less time sensitive, this to me feels more like a Sunday paper which you take all afternoon to digest in your leisure time. It’s a completely different concept and I personally believe a far bigger risk because I just can’t see the same demand for this type of publication from its current circulation.


I also feel the move to a weekly would impact negatively on advertising revenues. If the right people aren’t reading the paper, i.e. business decision makers, clients and more importantly, potential clients, then the advertisers will not book the space.


Of course it remains to be seen which option would be best received across the region and I hope that after your extensive consultation process, which I applaud you on, you will find the answer which will save such an historic and highly regarded paper. I am simply putting my vote forward for the more issues, less pages proposal. I wish the team all the very best of luck and would be more than happy to offer further views on the debate if required.

Mark Anslow
Lead Partner
BDO Stoy Hayward (Birmingham)

Jack Kirby said:

I don't buy the daily Post, but I would buy a weekly. But the quality of Post journalism needs to improve too.

Ken Welsby said:

On a rare trip back to Bham read yesterday's feedback in print, for once.

So sad to hear your news - but the important thing is to turn it into an opportunity.

I've been a business journalist / media person for 40 years, including 5 years as business editor of the Mail in the 70s. In that context I've been involved in several launches / relaunches / repackaging projects - including Business a.m. in Edinburgh (which sadly closed after just two great years).

So here's my take. The shrunken daily option is pointless. It [pardon me for the marketing speak but this is about business] devalues the brand and dilutes the USP. Forget it.

The sensible option is the combination of a live website plus a weekly regional magazine.
The website has two parts: free and paid.
The free part both stands on its own for "skimmers and dippers" and acts as a taster for the subscription title, which is available both online and weekly in print.

The trick is to focus the weekly content on analysis and in-depth coverage that people will pay for. Make it look more like a magazine - NOT a newspaper. But you could still have a "newsy" front like Campaign, which is a great format.

If your presses can handle a better grade of newspaper (magazine quality) so much the better. Advertisers prefer it, and editorial photos look better.

The other key point is to widen the talent pool. Find experts in every field plus 2-3 good columnists with hard-hitting views: they could be bankers, lawyers, day-traders or dog-walkers. Even politicians. But they need to have that "must read" factor that will have everyone clamouring for next week's issue.

Best wishes

Ken W

Ian Strachan said:

Marc

Nicholas Newman (above) and Bernard Zissman in today's Post are onto something. Regional and local newspapers are part of the fabric of a town or city, every bit as much as the local pub or the post office. They are not - and never have been - cash cows, and they rarely make money. In an ideal world local papers should not be owned by national groups. How can the emotion that is tied up in a regional newspaper title possibly be appreciated in a boardroom in London, where the priority - rightly for them - is shareholder value? Going weekly is, I am quite sure, the obvious answer from a financial point of view. But it would be the beginning of the end. It's much easier to close down a weekly than a daily at some point in the future, and Trinity Mirror has lots of form for closing down weeklies, even ones with heritages stretching back centuries - including the Walsall Observer, the paper I was proud to have cut my teeth on.
The New York Times, as a standalone product, doesn't make money - nor does the Washington Post or the Chicago Tribune. But can you imagine the clamour if it was suggested that one of those titles close or go weekly? There'd be rioting in the streets. Closer to home the same could be said about the Liverpool Echo. The Birmingham Post - as we've seen from some of the reactions above - is more than a newspaper, and it deserves to be taken into local ownership. Newspapers, like football clubs, don't make money for their owners, but they have huge emotional capital which is why they are desirable assets. I know Trinity Mirror made an abortive attempt to offload its Midland titles a while back, but I'm sure there is enough local capital to buy the title and build it up through investment, and make commercial arrangements with Trinity to enable it to be printed at the Fort. I write the Rich List so I know how much money is washing around the region. All it needs is someone to champion the coming together of a consortium. So come on, wealth creators of the Midlands. How much does the survival of the Birmingham Post mean to you?

Ian Strachan
Ian Strachan Communications Ltd.

I have three comments or points..


First general comment: if you got it right, a weekly digest of news across the region, with decent in-depth comment, would probably find a market. I'm pretty sure I would buy it regularly and I don't currently buy the Post.

I understand the argument about "old news" but other people have observed correctly that is, when a story is absolutely vital, we frequently learn about it via other sources that the newspapers these days.

Also, the days when "businessmen", as I think they were known, started the day by perusing a couple of newspapers to ease into their work load
 well, they’re long gone, surely?

I think the absorption of detailed news content (and I include things like football reports in this too) doesn't any longer need to occur at the moment the story hits the streets. Half the time, we can't fit it in. For every Post reader whose daily work load is immediately affected by what's in the newspaper, there are 100 who are merely interested and think "I'll have to have a look at that when I've got a minute". On the proposed weekly basis, they could just as easily be interested on a Thursday.

(Regarding the regional issue, yes, why is it called "Birmingham"? I live in Leicestershire and I can buy it in my local post office. Either it shouldn't be there, or it's got the wrong name.)


The second general comment: I don't know whether the Post itself will survive, but the idea that newspapers themselves are doomed doesn't wash with me. There is a sense of shared experience and impact that the front pages of papers on a newsstand achieves.

For example, I kept a copy of the Daily Telegraph front page in May, when they exposed Elliot Morley claiming £16,000 for a non-existent mortgage. In my work as a marketing consultant, I've subsequently shown it to numerous people and asked "Would this have had the same impact on you if it had popped up in your inbox at work?” Most agree it would not.

So, newspapers are not going to die out. Whether a weekly Post would die off, specifically, I'm not sure.

Third point: Someone suggested a merger with the Mail. Not sure. My ad agency pitched to the Mail years ago and proposed that it go free sheet in order to try and win back advertisers, like the supermarkets and car dealers, that its lack of circulation had put off. This appeared to be too radical a suggestion, but it's probably a better one than attempting a sort of business/tabloid/cat stuck in tree hybrid paper.

Bilbo said:

Quick question to all those who've suggested the weekly Post supported by a regularly updated website might be the answer - if the weekly option involves the laying off of journalists then who will create this quality local news for the website to update with?

Ursula said:

Bilbo, as valid your question as annoying it is:


Being in a 'full time' job is not meant to be a cushy number or "occupational therapy", and most certainly is not a right (if you want either do become a civil servant or join the growth industry of your local Job Centre Plus advisers).


Why shouldn't freelance journalists be paid - like a seamstress - for good piece work? So much more of an incentive to come up with high quality goods.


U

Dorothy Hobson said:

The Birmingham Post alongside the Birmingham Mail have been part of the strong media options that the people of Birmingham and the surrounding area have 'taken for granted' for many years. They are both excellent publications and manage to serve all their readers with different, relevant and well produced information. To lose the Post would be a disaster and I agree with The Editor that to produce a weekly paper of a high quality would be much preferable to a lesser daily edition. In fact, it is something to look forward to - a positive change which provides the possibility of a larger, quality paper to enjoy on its day of publication and throughout the weekend. Nobody throws out the Sunday papers for a few days and advertisements and content are read after the Sunday day of publication. This gives added life to the content and benefits advertisers. The Post must seize the opportunity and make the new venture a positive success for its staff and its readers. Good Luck.

TimHood said:

A really impressive debate. I've tried to summarise the main views in this blog post:
http://yooskit.blogspot.com/2009/08/four-reactions-when-business-faces.html

Bilbo said:

Ursula,

Do you really think they're going to pay freelancers when they're making cutbacks?! I'm guessing you don't know Trinity Mirror too well? Filling the time of full-time staff with freelancers costs a heck of a lot more.

No, it'll be press releases and PA news which will fill the void, thus negating any value in moving 'online'.

office worker said:

A weekly Post seems the most sensible option both financially and in terms of editorial quality. But will the business community it serves consider playing their part? If the readership stops paying PR companies to get "stories" into the Post, and actually invest in some advertising space, the Post could yet thrive as a quality weekly paper.

AndyC said:

Publishing a comprehensive weekly edition with all of the main elements of the current paper (including sport and the 'friday' supplement) could actually make the Post indispensable once more. I doubt that charging 70p for a 40 page daily edition of Press Association re-prints would attract many people, particularly when most of us can a similar level of information from the Metro for free.

I would hope though that the website will still continue to be updated with latest news on a daily basis, leaving the weekly newsprint version more for articles and analysis that wouldn't be available elsewhere (charge a subscription that covers the printed weekly and access to the website if necessary).

My only criticism of the current Post is that it focuses on the business market and almost ignores public-sector and other professional people in the West Mids who might also be interested in a quality local newspaper.

Ian Halstead said:

The inability of successive owners, and differing management teams, to stem the Post's downward spiral has been bemusing. Even in 1989, its circulation was under 30,000; mystifyingly small in per capita terms, compared with other major provincial cities. I fear that TM's latest attempt to reinvent the Post may be its death-knell though. Many posters support TM's preferred weekly option, but I don't see how the Post can retain enough staff of sufficient calibre to create the required backgrounders, news analysis and features which the new format requires, given the massive loss in income from advertisers and readers.
Given TM's constant demands for efficiency savings, it would seem that the very people the new format needs, are those high-earners most likely to be edged out of the door.

Nick Venning said:

I wonder if I can put this debate in the bigger picture....

In the world today, Britain is the nearest society that we have to the utopian liberal democracy or what Karl Popper call "The Open Society". This is why millions of immigrants have chosen to come and make their lives here ....as they have done for centuries.

One of the reasons for this is the checks and balances that the media provides over the polictical legislature, the executive and indeed even the behaviour of our courts. Whatever happens to The Birmingham Post in the future, those behind the editorial screens must never forget this or shirk from their responsibility in this matter. It is not just The Daily Telegraph that has this power; I'm sure that the Leader of Birmingham City Council would, in private at least, not deny the usefulness of The Birmingham Post in constraining the inappropriate concentration of political power in our city!

In addition, the media can be and, on balance, probably is a force for good. Over the last three and a half years, The Birmingham Post has, through Thrive, its corporate social responsibility partnership with the business community, hugely influenced attitudes to some of the most pressing social issues of our times. Now, as The Birmingham Post ponders the next steps in its distinguished history, would not be a good time to neglect this mission.

I cannot of course comment on the commercial issue of daily vs weekly; I simply don't have the information to judge. However, I hope that the above may inform the question of what newspapers are actually for and maybe influence your owners to consider the bigger picture in making their decision.

Nick Venning said:

Hi Marc - I wonder if I can put this debate in the bigger picture....

In the world today, Britain is the nearest society that we have to the utopian liberal democracy or what Karl Popper call "The Open Society". This is why millions of immigrants have chosen to come and make their lives here ....as they have done for centuries.

One of the reasons for this is the checks and balances that the media provides over the polictical legislature, the executive and indeed even the behaviour of our courts. Whatever happens to The Birmingham Post in the future, those behind the editorial screens must never forget this or shirk from their responsibility in this matter. It is not just The Daily Telegraph that has this power; I'm sure that the Leader of Birmingham City Council would, in private at least, not deny the usefulness of The Birmingham Post in constraining the inappropriate concentration of political power in our city!

In addition, the media can be and, on balance, probably is a force for good. Over the last three and a half years, The Birmingham Post has, through Thrive, its corporate social responsibility partnership with the business community, hugely influenced attitudes to some of the most pressing social issues of our times. Now, as The Birmingham Post ponders the next steps in its distinguished history, would not be a good time to neglect this mission.

I cannot of course comment on the commercial issue of daily vs weekly; I simply don't have the information to judge. However, I hope that the above may inform the question of what newspapers are actually for and maybe influence your owners to consider the bigger picture in making their decision.

Kate Cooper said:

News is now free, the scarcity is human attention. So reinvention is the name of the game. If the continuously-on-line plus the fat-weekly-print doesn't work, then change again, and then again.


Today's Post targets today's Birmingham business community. It's a tiny community and largely homogenous. Moreover, tomorrow’s business community in the new economy will be very different from today’s. So diversifying the content to attract new readership is a vital move.


e.g. Few realise that world-renown scientists, men and women working at the forefront of human endeavour, work right here in the West Midlands. Many of them are life scientists and medics, others experts in nanotechnology, energy, virtual realities, materials and other emerging technologies . . . They are the revolutionaries. Their research is a source of innovation. What they're doing, what they can see their colleagues across the world doing, will change our lives greatly — it's fascinating stuff, it grabs attention!

Former Post Reader said:

I stopped buying the Post a few years back when it became clear much of the news was recycled national guff and there were only a handful of obviously over-worked journalists filling the pages. It also became clear that almost any corporate bull would be reprinted with hardly any analysis or even checking of facts.

Last year I realised the one or two useful articles a week were available online, free and in a timely fashion.

Obviously pursuit of readers is not something the Post was bothered about, as long as advertisers have kept the cash rolling in. Now the tap has been turned off suddenly you ask readers what they want.

Surely this is a sham consultation anyway.
What kind of company tells the world one option is less of what you get now for the same money? It is clear that TM has made a decision and the editor is has to go away and justify this. Something Paul Dale has frequently bashed Birmingham City Council for.

Ursula said:

Marc remember: You promised us a digest of all the - so diverse - feed back to your posting. A task I don't envy you.


Thank you, Nick Venning, for reminding me of the long since forgotten Popper of my early studies. OH MY GOD.


Whilst I share Former Post Reader's cynical view - to some extent - I don't think it particularly helpful to stop buying one's local paper. It's like frequenting Tesco instead of giving your local shop/market a chance of survival.


I wholeheartedly underwrite Kate Cooper's passionate plea for reinvention. We all need to do it every so often. Go with the Zeitgeist is the name of the game; think outside the box.


Bilbo, you are spot on: I don't know the Trinity Mirror. Your notion that freelancers come more expensive than employed staff appears outmoded in today's climate. Surely, they'll fix their price - as in any free market - to meet what they can supply and what is in demand. Fees will tumble and may the best, and most committed, writers undercut the rest of their sound bite colleagues.


U

Bilbo said:

Ursula,

You miss the point on freelancers and market forces. Trinity Mirror's policies will mean freelancers will only be used when the free bit becomes literal.

Quite what makes anyone believe that Trinity's axemen and woman (and I don't mean that singularly for Sly) will make a pot of freelance money available is beyond me.

Ben said:

The more I think about it the more the prospect of a weekly seems to be a sad reflection on the city. If a million people can't sustain one quality daily local then I don't believe the weekly+website option is going to work either. I am not convinced that web-based news is in any way a financially sustainable model. The web may attract lots of readers but it doesn't produce the revenues needed to sustain the business. It won't be long before the editor is posting another comment piece on how the website is losing £6m a year and they're going to have to close the weekly edition as well.

Ian Halstead's observation is interesting - that the circulation of the Post has always been relatively low compared to other local/regional papers in Britain's other major cities. I think this says more about the attitudes, aspirations and sense of pride of Birmingham's citizenry than it does about the quality of the Post. Outside of a small (and commendable) chattering class, there really seems to be extremely limited engagement within Birmingham with how the city develops, grows and faces future challenges.

I would argue that what the Post needs more than anything is a cultural shift within the city. If people were more engaged politically and culturally with their city they would naturally gravitate to the one main source of information - the Post. Perhaps the Post's decline can be seen in relation to widespread disinterest in local government. May be the best thing for the Post's circulation would be a mayoral election?!


What are the Post's biggest audiences now? Business people and Villa, Blues, Baggies and other sports fans?

Why not more detailed web and mobile products for them? Where's the subscription based iPhone app that will let me soak up Baggies content for example?

I paid £1.50 for iFooty and it pulls in megre content from the BBC. I'd pay a lot more for the detailed material your papers provide.

Good luck with whatever you decide.

Colin Coley said:

I would count myself among your readers who have a fanatical allegiance to The Birmingham Post.
I’ve been a reader for most of my adult life, and even before that. When I was a pupil at Pitmaston Boys School in the 60’s there was a board in a corridor for newspapers. On one side would be The Daily Mail (a broadsheet then) and on the other The Birmingham Post.
Unlike the majority of Post readers, I’m not in a business or profession whereby I need to keep my finger on the financial pulse.
So why do I buy the Post?
Well to a certain extent for what’s not in it. I’m not that bothered what Posh & David are up to, if I want to know what’s going to happen in Weatherfield next week I’ll look in a listings guide, and I certainly don’t want an Australian telling me what to think about our Continental Neighbours.
What I do want is local, national, and international news presented to the highest standards.

A lot has been written recently about the plight of the Birmingham Post. I must admit I’ve not read every word, but so far I’ve not seen any reference to the Post’s previous incarnation as a tabloid. (I think this was late 80’s early 90’s). I think it would be worth a try to return to this format, that is to say a quality newspaper with a strong business/finance section, which would hopefully have a wider appeal and boost circulation. In my opinion the emphasis on business news is too great now, and if anything part of the problem.

In any event The Birmingham Post should remain a daily paper, preferably with a Saturday edition. The only paper worth a trip to the newsstand on Saturday at the moment is The Independent; priced at £1.60 this could be easily undercut.
Personally I don’t see any future for a weekly Post.

Colin Coley
Hall Green.

Have blogged (again) on the debate so far: http://bit.ly/FkR79. After a week of debate, the Weekly route remains the choice option it seems to me. Have commented on the more difficult decision facing the Mail and whether we should already be looking for a longer term solution in what James Murdoch last week termed the 'all-media market.'

Ian Halstead said:

It will be interesting to see an update from Marc, especially re feedback from advertisers.
I would suspect many are puzzled that TM isn't simply merging the ever-more 'parish pump' Mail with the Post, to produce one decent mid-market publication.

Ben said:

Was in Devon over the weekend and took a look at the excellent Western Morning News and wondered how it maintains such high standards and relatively good circulation (circa 40,000). One obvious factor is that its title doesn't restrict its readership solely to Plymouth (where it is based/published) and it therefore sells well across the region.

Could the B'ham Post either rename itself (as perhaps simply 'The Post') or have an identical regional issue with a different name ('The Midlander'/'Midlands Post' etc) that allowed it to tap into a wider demographic?

Ben said:

Interesting developments in London, where the Standard has just announced it is going 'free':

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/02/london-evening-standard-free

robert gray said:

where do some of these people think the cash comes from?

so they really think a local businessman is going to invest in this title?

why would they waste thier money?

no local businessmen own football teams any more!!

think people should realise commercial realities!

Nice site. I obtained a number of great information here. I have been watching this stuff for awhile. It's intriguing the way it retains varying, but some of the core parts keep the same.

Hi there, I log on to your blogs daily. Your humoristic style
is witty, keep doing what you're doing!

Heels said:

Hey! Do you use Twitter? I'd like to follow you if that would be ok. I'm absolutely enjoying your blog and look
forward to new updates.

Premier said:

Superb post however , I was wanting to know if you could
write a litte more on this subject? I'd be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Kudos!

Hi, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility
issues. When I look at your blog site in Ie, it looks fine but when
opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping.

I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, fantastic
blog!

Thanks to my father who told me concerning this website, this web site is really amazing.

automatske said:

Howdy! This is kind of off topic but I need some
advice from an established blog. Is it very
hard to set up your own blog? I'm not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I'm thinking about
creating my own but I'm not sure where to start. Do you have any ideas or suggestions? Cheers

dekorativno said:

My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find most of your post's to be just what I'm looking for.
Would you offer guest writers to write content for you personally?
I wouldn't mind composing a post or elaborating on a lot of the subjects you write in relation to here. Again, awesome weblog!

Victoria said:

Hmm it looks like your blog ate my first comment
(it was extremely long) so I guess I'll just sum it up what I had written and say, I'm thoroughly enjoying your blog.

I too am an aspiring blog writer but I'm still new to everything. Do you have any tips for novice blog writers? I'd genuinely appreciate
it.

wso guide said:

I've read some excellent stuff here. Certainly value bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how so much effort you put to make one of these fantastic informative website.

This article is truly a pleasant one it assists new the
web viewers, who are wishing in favor of blogging.

info said:

Incredible! I'm genuinely enjoying the style and design of your blog. Are you using a custom made template or is this freely available to all individuals? If you really don't
want to say the name of it out in the general public, please
e-mail me at: vivien.keeney@gawab.com. I'd really enjoy to get my hands on this template! Cheers.

Ron said:

Birmingham is not a bad place to visit or live. I been there few times and always enjoyed it.

I feel this is one of the such a lot important information for me.
And i am happy studying your article. But should commentary on
few common things, The site style is perfect, the articles
is truly excellent : D. Excellent activity, cheers

For latest news you have to go to see web and on world-wide-web I found
this web site as a best website for most up-to-date
updates.

I'm curious to find out what blog platform you are using? I'm experiencing some minor security problems with my
latest website and I'd like to find something more safe. Do you have any suggestions?

This piece of writing will assist the internet viewers for creating
new web site or even a blog from start to end.

Kwao Krua is a natural part of the biota in Thailand, and has been experimented on to prove that it increases breast size and enhances
breast development. Listen to other people's testimonials. There are a multitude of different exercises that you can do to improve the size and shape of your breasts.

lnx.icsci.it said:

hey there and thank you for your information – I've certainly picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise a few technical points using this website, as I experienced to reload the website many times previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK? Not that I am complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will sometimes affect your placement in google and can damage your high-quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I'm adding this RSS to my e-mail and could look out for a lot more of your respective intriguing content.
Make sure you update this again very soon.

I like it whenever people get together and share ideas. Great
website, keep it up!

This post will assist the internet viewers for setting up new weblog
or even a weblog from start to end.

Hello! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog.
Is it very hard to set up your own blog? I'm not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I'm thinking about setting up
my own but I'm not sure where to start. Do you have any tips or suggestions? Many thanks

I blog frequently and I seriously appreciate your content.

The article has truly peaked my interest. I am
going to take a note of your website and keep checking
for new information about once per week. I subscribed to your Feed too.

n.modareb.me said:

Hi there to every single one, it's really a pleasant for me to go to see this website, it includes helpful Information.

Bradley said:

I am extremely impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your blog.
Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself?
Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it is rare to see a great blog like this
one these days.

Every weekend i used to pay a visit this web page, for
the reason that i want enjoyment, as this this website conations really pleasant funny information
too.

Julius said:

Good post. I learn something new and challenging on websites I stumbleupon everyday.
It will always be helpful to read articles from
other authors and use a little something from their web sites.

Elana said:

So if you definitely have to have a superior ab belt, right here are some
alternatives which you can take into account.

Wow, this post is fastidious, my sister is analyzing such
things, therefore I am going to inform her.

Hello! Would you mind if I share your blog with my twitter group?
There's a lot of people that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Cheers

Hello, I log on to your new stuff daily. Your humoristic style is awesome,
keep up the good work!

This is really interesting, You are an excessively skilled blogger.
I have joined your rss feed and sit up for in the hunt for extra of your wonderful
post. Additionally, I've shared your website in my social networks

Liliana said:

I'm new to building websites and I was wanting to know if having your website title related to your articles and other content really that critical? I notice your title, " Why the Birmingham Post must change - Birmingham Post " does appear to be spot on with what your website is about however, I prefer to keep my title less content descriptive and based more around site branding. Would you think this is a good idea or bad idea? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Every weekend i used to pay a quick visit this web site,
as i want enjoyment, since this this site conations really
good funny stuff too.

Terese said:

I am sure this piece of writing has touched all the internet
visitors, its really really pleasant paragraph on
building up new weblog.

I almost never leave remarks, however i did some searching and wound up here Why the Birmingham Post
must change - Birmingham Post - News Blog. And
I do have a few questions for you if it's allright. Is it only me or does it look as if like some of these remarks appear as if they are coming from brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are posting at other places, I would like to follow everything fresh you have to post. Could you list of the complete urls of your community pages like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?

Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I could add to my
blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates.

I've been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this. Please let me know if you run into anything. I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates.

Johnny said:

Unquestionably believe that which you stated.
Your favorite reason seemed to be on the internet the
easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while
people think about worries that they just don't know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto
a colleague who had been doing a little research on this. And he in fact ordered me lunch due to
the fact that I found it for him... lol. So
let me reword this.... Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending time
to talk about this issue here on your blog.

ps3 ylod fix said:

A motivating discussion is definitely worth comment. I do think that you should write more on this subject matter, it might not be a taboo matter but typically folks don't discuss these issues. To the next! All the best!!

Why users still make use of to read news papers when in this technological world the whole
thing is accessible on net?

tattoo ideas said:

I am sure this post has touched all the internet visitors, its really
really pleasant post on building up new weblog.

Piece of writing writing is also a fun, if you be familiar with after that you can
write or else it is complicated to write.

You should take part in a contest for one of the greatest sites online.
I most certainly will highly recommend this blog!

This article provides clear idea designed for the new users of blogging,
that really how to do running a blog.

This post is invaluable. Where can I find out more?

This is really attention-grabbing, You're an excessively professional blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to searching for more of your great post. Additionally, I have shared your website in my social networks

My spouse and I absolutely love your blog and find the majority of
your post's to be precisely what I'm looking for. Does one offer guest
writers to write content for you? I wouldn't mind creating a post or elaborating on a number of the subjects you write concerning here. Again, awesome web site!

Hello! Quick question that's completely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My site looks weird when browsing from my iphone 4. I'm
trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to resolve this problem.
If you have any recommendations, please share. Appreciate it!

I was recommended this web site by my cousin.
I am not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed
about my problem. You're wonderful! Thanks!

Keep this going please, great job!

Ronda said:

Great website. A lot of helpful information here. I am sending it to some friends ans additionally sharing in delicious.
And of course, thank you to your effort!

Ahaa, its fastidious discussion on the topic of this post here at this blog, I have read all
that, so at this time me also commenting here.

Hey! I know this is kinda off topic but I'd figured I'd ask.
Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest writing a blog post or vice-versa?
My site addresses a lot of the same topics as yours and I believe we could greatly benefit from each other.
If you're interested feel free to send me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from you! Wonderful blog by the way!

Wonderful items from you, man. I've consider your stuff prior to and you are just too excellent. I actually like what you've obtained here, really like what you are stating and the way in which through which you are saying it.
You are making it entertaining and you still take care of to keep
it wise. I can't wait to read much more from you. This is really a wonderful website.

Hello to all, how is all, I think every one is getting more from this website, and your
views are good in support of new users.

I will immediately clutch your rss as I can't to find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Kindly permit me recognise so that I may just subscribe. Thanks.

You've made some decent points there. I looked on the web to learn more about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this site.

cicerone.org said:

I quite like reading through an article that will make men and women think.
Also, thank you for allowing for me to comment!

Pretty! This has been a really wonderful article. Thank
you for providing these details.

My brother suggested I might like this blog.

He was totally right. This submit truly made my day.
You can not believe simply how a lot time I had spent for this
information! Thank you!

Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something informative to read?

Great info. Lucky me I came across your site by chance (stumbleupon).
I've book-marked it for later!

あらまあ! すごい記事の男。 感謝 それでも 私は経験困難ウルRSSで。ドン抰なぜそれを購読することができません知っている。ありますか誰取得同じ RSS デメリット?親切に応えます。| | 誰誰 は意識であることを知っている。 Thnkx

Arnold said:

Still think it's cheating to rely on someone else's guidance (what about your dance teacher's. You can also say aloud your reasoning behind this experiment. It is preferable to do this internally - use your imagination.

Appreciation to my father who shared with me about this weblog, this weblog is genuinely awesome.

voyance said:

Horoscope gemeaux 2012 amour urdupoint horoscope

Excellent post however I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this topic? I'd be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit more. Thanks!

I always used to study post in news papers but now as I am a user of net therefore from now I am using net for articles or reviews, thanks
to web.

What's Going down i'm new to this, I stumbled upon this I've discovered It absolutely helpful and it has helped me out loads. I am hoping to give a contribution & assist other customers like its helped me. Good job.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

This is to help prevent spamming and confirm you are a human

 

News authors

Jonathan Walker

Jonathan Walker - The Birmingham Post's political editor
My postings | Jonathan Walker's RSS feed My feed

Subscribe to receive updates by email
David Kuczora

David Kuczora - A PR consultant working in Birmingham and living in the 'burbs
My postings

Alister Scott

Alister Scott - Professor of Spatial Planning and Governance, Birmingham City University
My postings

Recent Posts

Latest Birmingham Post Lifestyle blog

Lifestyle Blog

Birmingham Post staff and guest bloggers from the midlands give you the lowdown on what's happening in your region and some musings on culture in the UK and beyond.

Latest Birmingham Post Science blog

Latest Birmingham Post Sport blog

Keep up to date

Sponsored Links