http://blogs.birminghampost.co.uk/news/

Birmingham's new library and the verbal contract

By Paul Dale on Sep 2, 10 02:04 PM in

Those of you fascinated by interesting statistics might like to try this for size.
The £330 million that Birmingham City Council expects to have to cut from its budgets over the next four years as a result of the public spending squeeze doesn't even come close to the £590 million it will have to pay for its grand new civic library in Centenary Square.
Granted, the bill for the library will be repaid over 60 years. But the true cost of the project, taking into account cash loans and maintenance payments, has certainly saddled the council with a financial headache that it could do without.
Quite correctly, council leaders are focusing on the difficult decisions that must be made with regards to finding £330 million in a very short period and are openly admitting that thousands of jobs may disappear along with harsh cuts to services.
With the benefit of hindsight, would council leader Mike Whitby have been quite so keen on building the library if he had an inkling of the unprecedented cuts in government funding heading Birmingham's way. Knowing Whitby, the answer is a resounding yes.

That doesn't mean, though, that the library project has the enthusiastic backing of the entire council Conservative group.
A recent government report detailing steadily falling numbers of people visiting libraries in England has left some Tories wondering whether Birmingham is some 20 years late replacing its main library.
Cabinet leisure member Martin Mullaney, meanwhile, has been told to find £5.4 million efficiency savings in his budget as part of the council's preparations for government spending cuts. The figure, by another extraordinary coincidence, is very close to the £6 million a year the council must find to repay interest on the loans it has taken out to build the new library.
Mullaney insists that the £6 million figure will not have to come from the leisure department budget.
It will be paid out of what the council calls the "corporate centre", better known as cash reserves or rainy day funds.
He says he has Coun Whitby's verbal assurance that this will happen through the method of topping up his department's budget by £6 million year on year during the lengthy 60-year repayment period.
Unfortunately for Mullaney, the last financial breakdown of the leisure budget produced by council number crunchers shows precisely zero increase in the budget over the next 10 years. There is as yet no indication that Whitby and his cheque book are waiting around the corner.
The leisure budget stands at £43 million today and is projected to remain at £43 million in 2020. When inflation is taken into account, say three per cent a year, this could amount to cutting the amount of money available for leisure and cultural services by almost a third.
All eyes are on Mullaney's strategic review of the city's 40 community libraries, which will take into account value for money and look at the type of service required in future. He won't need me to remind him that he is treading on very dangerous ground indeed, for opponents of the council leader's civic library scheme have always believed the project will ultimately be paid for through saving money by closing community libraries.
This is not the case at all, according to the cabinet member, who is trumpeting Mike Whitby's verbal assurance that the library loan payments will be covered.
Somehow I am reminded of legendary Hollywood film producer Sam Goldwyn's famous remark: "A verbal contract ain't worth the paper it's written on."

3 Comments

JOHN REVILL said:

Martin Mullaney is in a ridiculous position. Obviously this unecessary white elephant will be paid for by slashing community provision used by the less well off. He should do the decent thing and resign.

Ian Halstead said:

I'm all for the (occasional) use of hyperbole, but what credibility does the £590m figure have - especially when it factors in £180 million of maintenance costs over the next six decades, assumes no private sector support, and adds in interest charges?
Are we going to see similar back-of-the-beer mat calculations for New St Gateway, and every other proposed building in the city?
Even the biggest critic of PFI never thought to include 60 years of cleaning costs, for the properties being built.

Matthew Bott said:

Agreed - what about the cleaning and maintenance costs of the current Central Library which are probably not factored into the equation? They should at least be deducted from the sum total as the council would have to pay these out anyway. And also a calculation needs to be made for the revenues that the council will get from the redevelopment of Paradise Circus which will provide sustained income.

The new library will be a real boon for the city, should re-invigorate the library's use and desire for learning and will provide a new cultural centre. But perhaps more important overall is the redevelopment of Paradise Circus helping link up the city core, Convention Quarter and Jewellery Quarter. If we are going to replace the Central Library we need to do it properly - and this new one fulfils that role.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

This is to help prevent spamming and confirm you are a human

 

News authors

Jonathan Walker

Jonathan Walker - The Birmingham Post's political editor
My postings | Jonathan Walker's RSS feed My feed

Subscribe to receive updates by email
David Kuczora

David Kuczora - A PR consultant working in Birmingham and living in the 'burbs
My postings

Alister Scott

Alister Scott - Professor of Spatial Planning and Governance, Birmingham City University
My postings

Recent Posts

Latest Birmingham Post Business blog

Latest Birmingham Post Lifestyle blog

Lifestyle Blog

Birmingham Post staff and guest bloggers from the midlands give you the lowdown on what's happening in your region and some musings on culture in the UK and beyond.

Latest Birmingham Post Science blog

Latest Birmingham Post Sport blog

Keep up to date

Sponsored Links