A brave new world of sport
Sometimes, I have to remind myself that this is the best job in the world. I've been a sports fan all my life; one of my first memories is being in floods of tears the night England's footballers went out of the 1970 World Cup in Mexico City; one of my favourite memories is watching from the press box as Tamworth won the FA Vase at the old Wembley in 1989; one of the things I want to do before I die is watch a Major League Baseball game in the United States.
I get paid moderately well to spend my working hours reading about sport, looking at pictures of sport, talking about the best ways to cover sport in The Post. I work with people I like who (mostly) share my love of sport and, yes, I do very, very, occasionally get into sports events for nothing.
And now, the editor's gone and made the job just that bit better by asking me to blog about sport.
I see this as a way for The Post's sports coverage to involve our readers in a way it never has before because now we can talk to you and you can talk to us.
Over the 15 years I've worked on The Post, the paper has evolved enormously, but previous editors and sports editors have had a very fixed idea of the people who venture into our little corner of the newspaper. They're probably Aston Villa fans (I'm not, but we won't go there at the moment), they're probably Moseley or Pertemps Bees fans and they are almost certainly Warwickshire or Worcestershire cricket supporters. They might be interested in horse racing and they might pop out of the office at lunchtime for a flutter at their local branch of William Hill.
They play golf at weekends and on corporate golf days, they might play hockey or squash and they spend Saturday mornings ferrying their children around as they pursue their own sporting interests. So those are the things we've covered with varying degrees of interest and success.
And no-one's ever asked you whether we're doing it right.
Well, the world has changed since 1992. The basic facts about sport can be obtained from dozens of other places with far more resources, so perhaps it's time to ask what you want from us.
Do you want to know that Martin O'Neill thinks Saturday's trip to Everton is a 'must-win' game? That Alex McLeish wants the fans to get behind Birmingham City in their last three games? That Gabriel Agbonlahor thinks Ashley Young is a good bloke?
Or do you want more comment and opinion from a team of writers which, in my view, is as talented as The Post has had in my time here?
Do we cover grassroots local sports properly? Should we even be acknowledging the sporting world outside the West Midlands? If we didn't, what would we put in its place? We do, after all, have six broadsheet pages to fll on most nights.
I don't know the answers to those questions and they provoke debate even on the sports desk itself. But this blog will hopefully give us the chance to ask the people who matter most. You, the reader.
Martin Warrillow is deputy sports editor of The Birmingham Post. Born in Kidderminster, he has spent the last 35 years watching, among others, Kidderminster Harriers, Tamworth FC, Worcestershire CCC, Moseley RFC and Cradley Speedway.
His sporting career ended when he twisted his knee while playing for Kidderminster Hockey Club's 4th XI in 1979.
Older/Newer
« Friday night Six Nations? Is nothing sacred? | Try of the Season »
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: A brave new world of sport.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.birminghampost.net/cgi-bin/mtcs4/mt-tb.cgi/3258











I would like to see sport from all over the world..
What about angling - the most popular participant sport in the country ...
On the subject of newspaper editors' sporting likes and dislikes, why has the Birmingham Post discontinued its Monday morning speedway feature.
This was an informative and well written weekly article and was well received by Birmingham Speedway enthusiasts like myself, but if this has been scrapped as a cost cutting exercise why is it that speedway has to be the victim?
Perhaps the Post should look at cutting back on the saturation coverage it is giving to football especially during the close-season continue to give the so-called lesser sports a fair crack of the whip?
This is a very disappointing and depressing move by the Post and in my view, should be reviewed.
On the subject of newspaper editors' sporting likes and dislikes, why has the Birmingham Post discontinued its Monday morning speedway feature.
This was an informative and well written weekly article and was well received by Birmingham Speedway enthusiasts like myself, but if this has been scrapped as a cost cutting exercise why is it that speedway has to be the victim?
Perhaps the Post should look at cutting back on the saturation coverage it is giving to football especially during the close-season continue to give the so-called lesser sports a fair crack of the whip?
This is a very disappointing and depressing move by the Post and in my view, should be reviewed.
The answer, I'm afraid, comes down to simple economics.
At a time when all newspapers are suffering a severe downturn in advertising revenue, the sports editor has had to examine every penny we pay out.
It was felt that the money spent buying in speedway coverage from a freelance journalist was not justified by the level of interest in the sport among Post readers.
It's not a question of the sports' desks likes or dislikes, simply a question of what we think will generate most interest among our readers in the paper and on the web.
Since we launched our new website, it's become clear that the big hits among our readers are Birmingham City, Aston Villa and West Bromwich Albion, as well as George Dobell's Warwickshire cricket coverage.
Consequently, at a time when we are tightening our belts, that's where our main focus has to be.